DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Trog, 323 N.W.2d 28.

571 citing documents.

  • State v. Kinsky 348 N.W.2d 319 Minn. 1984
    “[A] sentencing court may stay execution of a presumptively executed sentence if the facts indicate that the defendant is particularly amenable to treatment in a probationary setting.”
  • State v. Dietz 344 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1984
  • State v. Dietz 344 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1984
    rial court’s belief that a stiffer sentence was needed to deter defendant and others are not factors justifying a durational departure or one with respect to consecutive service); (defendant’s chemical dependency problem and his dangerousness are not the sort of factors which can be relied upon as justifying a durational departure); (a defendant’s remorse and attitude in court are relevant factors in deciding whether to depart dispositionally).
  • State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Back 341 N.W.2d 273 Minn. 1983
    a defendant’s lack of remorse could relate back and be considered as evidence bearing on a determination of the cruelty or seriousness of the conduct on which the conviction was based); n. 1 (Minn.1983) (indicating that the defendant’s lack of remorse was not a factor justifying a durational departure or one with respect to consecutive service); (indicating that a defendant’s remorse and attitude in court are relevant factors in deciding whether to depart dis-positionally).
  • State v. Heywood 338 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Heywood 338 N.W.2d 243 Minn. 1983
    we said, “Numerous factors, including the defendant’s age, his prior record, his remorse, his cooperation, his attitude while in court, and the support of friends and/or family, are relevant to a determination whether a defendant is particularly suitable to individualized treatment in a probationary s
  • State v. King 337 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1983
  • State v. King 337 N.W.2d 674 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Nelson 329 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1983
  • Jackson v. State 329 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1983
  • Jackson v. State 329 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Clemmer 328 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Clemmer 328 N.W.2d 739 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Hennessy 328 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Bentley 329 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Hennessy 328 N.W.2d 442 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Bentley 329 N.W.2d 39 Minn. 1983
  • State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982
  • State v. Brusven 327 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1982