Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Swenson's Estate, 56 N.W. 1115.

44 citing documents.

Matter of Estate of Uliscni 372 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Matter of Estate of Uliscni 372 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300, 304 , 56 N.W.
In Re the Trusts Created in & by the Last Will & Testament of HARTMAN 347 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1984
In Re the Trusts Created in & by the Last Will & Testament of HARTMAN 347 N.W.2d 480 Minn. 1984
In re Swenson 's Estate, 55 Minn. 300, 308-09 , 56 N.W.
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Schmidt 256 Minn. 64 Minn. 1959
First National Bank v. Kirschmann 97 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1959
First National Bank v. Kirschmann 97 N.W.2d 441 Minn. 1959
The rule which has been most consistently followed in this state was clearly stated in In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , .
In Re Trusteeship Under Will of Schmidt 256 Minn. 64 Minn. 1959
The rule which has been most consistently followed in this state was clearly stated in In re Swenson's Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , 56 N.W.
In Re Trust Under Will of Holden 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
Holden v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
Holden v. First National Bank & Trust Co. 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
See In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , .
In Re Trust Under Will of Holden 291 N.W. 104 Minn. 1940
See In re Swenson's Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , 56 N.W.
Cochran v. Whitby 264 N.W. 427 Minn. 1935
In Re Estate Soper 264 N.W. 427 Minn. 1935
Cochran v. Whitby 264 N.W. 427 Minn. 1935
Thus in In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , , testator had made a will in 1884.
In Re Estate Soper 264 N.W. 427 Minn. 1935
Thus in In re Swenson's Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , 56 N.W.
Jacobson v. Mankato Loan & Trust Co. 253 N.W. 365 Minn. 1934
In Re Estate of Sherk 253 N.W. 365 Minn. 1934
Jacobson v. Mankato Loan & Trust Co. 253 N.W. 365 Minn. 1934
It is enough merely to cite In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , ; Fox v. Hicks, 81 Minn. 197 , , 50 L. R. A. 663; Brookhouse v. Pray, 92 Minn. 448 , ; Johrden v. Pond, 126 Minn. 247 , ; Buck v. Huntley, 151 Minn. 446 , .
In Re Estate of Sherk 253 N.W. 365 Minn. 1934
It is enough merely to cite In re Swenson's Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , 56 N.W.
Benson v. Benson 194 N.W. 766 Minn. 1923
Benson v. Benson 194 N.W. 766 Minn. 1923
This last quoted language was used with respect to a gift to “my heirs, in the manner provided by the laws of New Jersey respecting intestate estates.” The respondents rely, and the final decision in the district court was based, upon Be Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , .
Buck v. Huntley 187 N.W. 411 Minn. 1922
Buck v. Huntley 187 N.W. 411 Minn. 1922
In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , ; Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , ; Brookhouse v. Pray, 92 Minn. 448 , ; Johrden v. Pond, 126 Minn. 247 , ; In re Bell, 147 Minn. 62 , ; In re Estate of J. D. Anderson, 148 Minn. 44 , .
In re the Estate of Meldrum 183 N.W. 835 Minn. 1921
In re the Estate of Meldrum 183 N.W. 835 Minn. 1921
Long v. Willsey, 132 Minn. 316 -320, ; Brookhouse v. Pray, 92 Minn. 448 -451, ; Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , ; In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , .
Anderson v. Brower 180 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1921
Anderson v. Brower 180 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1921
48 ; Whiting v. Whiting, 42 Minn. 548 , ; In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , ; State v. Willrich, 72 Minn. 165 , ; Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , ; Brookhouse v. Pray, 92 Minn. 448 , ; Davis v. Hancock, 95 Minn. 340 , 104 * ; Rong v. Haller, 109 Minn. 191 , , 26 L.R.A.(N.S.)
In re the Trusteeship under the Last Will & Testament of Bell 179 N.W. 650 Minn. 1920
In re the Trusteeship under the Last Will & Testament of Bell 179 N.W. 650 Minn. 1920
In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , ; Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , ; Johrden v. Pond, 126 Minn. 247 , .
Barney v. May 160 N.W. 790 Minn. 1917
Barney v. May 160 N.W. 790 Minn. 1917
In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300, 308 , .
Johrden v. Pond 148 N.W. 112 Minn. 1914
Johrden v. Pond 148 N.W. 112 Minn. 1914
* * ■ * As such instruments always vary, subtle rules of construction, so often resorted to, obstruct, rather than assist, in determining the intention of the testator.” To the same effect are In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , ; Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , .
Lohlker v. Lohlker 127 N.W. 1122 Minn. 1910
Lohlker v. Lohlker 127 N.W. 1122 Minn. 1910
Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , ; In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , .
Rong v. Haller 123 N.W. 471 Minn. 1909
Rong v. Haller 123 N.W. 471 Minn. 1909
Simpson v. Cook, 24 Minn. 180 ; In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , ; Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , .
Brookhouse v. Pray 100 N.W. 235 Minn. 1904
Brookhouse v. Pray 100 N.W. 235 Minn. 1904
In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , ; Yates v. Shern, 84 Minn. 161 , ; Schouler, Wills, § 463.
Yates v. Shern 86 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1901
Yates v. Shern 86 N.W. 1004 Minn. 1901
That presented by the other is whether grandchildren and great-grandchildren of such first cous *165 ins are comprehended and included in the term, “child or children of any deceased parent.” The rule to be applied in the construction of wills is stated in Ee Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300, 308 , , as follows: “The cardinal rule in the construction of wills, to which all others must bend, is that the intention of the testator expressed in the instrument shall prevail, provided that it be consist
State ex rel. Sisters of the Order of St. Benedict v. Willrich 75 N.W. 123 Minn. 1898
State ex rel. Sisters of the Order of St. Benedict v. Willrich 75 N.W. 123 Minn. 1898
This question was not called to the attention of the court in the cases of In re Swenson’s Estate, 55 Minn. 300 , , and In re Terry’s Estate, 58 Minn. 268 , .