Cited by

279 Minn. 188, 192, (citing Bowen v. Thwing, 56 Minn. 177, 179, ).

Co., 56 Minn. 180 , 57 N.W.

Both parties rely on Bowen v. Thwing, 56 Minn. 177 , .

Elston v. Fieldman, 57 Minn. 70 , ; Bowen v. Thwing, 56 Minn. 177 , .

Co., 35 Minn. 361 , ; Farnham v. Murch, 36 Minn. 328 , ; Payette v. Day, 37 Minn. 366 , ; Fergestad v. Gjertsen, 46 Minn. 369 , ; Bowen v. Thwing, 56 Minn. 177 , ; Williams v. Mechanics, 54 N. Y. 577 .

Elston v. Fieldman, 57 Minn. 70 , ; Bowen v. Thwing, 56 Minn. 177 , .

Co., 56 Minn. 180 , , the court construed this section in connection with section 2599, G. S. 1894, and held that a stockholder’s liability for unpaid subscriptions does not continue after he has transferred it, except when the transfer was for the purpose of defrauding creditors.

Co., 56 Minn. 180, 185 , .

Co., 56 Minn. 180 , , was a proceeding under G. S. 1894, §§ 3430-3435, inclusive, to dissolve the corporation, and it was held that unpaid stock subscriptions were corporate assets, and might be recovered by the receiver.

Co., 56 Minn. 180 , ( ,) it was held that the proceeding regulated by 1878, G. S. ch. 34, §§ 415 to 420, inclusive, being one to dissolve a corporation, settle its business, and convert its assets, and apply the proceeds in payment of its debts, stockholders cannot be *558 brought in to answer to their statutory liability