DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hickok v. Margolis, 22 N.W.2d 850.

29 citing documents.

  • Ayers v. Kalal 925 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • Ayers v. Kalal 925 N.W.2d 291 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
    See Hickok v. Margolis , 221 Minn. 480 , , 852 (1946) ("Courts have nothing to do with the wisdom or expediency of statutes.
  • Roquemore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 610 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • Roquemore v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 610 N.W.2d 694 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    The remedy for unwise or inexpedient legislation is political and not judicial.’ ”) (quoting Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480, 485 , ).
  • LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
  • LaChapelle v. Mitten 607 N.W.2d 151 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
    The remedy for unwise or inexpedient legislation is political and not judicial’ ”) (quoting Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480, 485 , ).
  • Blanche v. 1995 Pontiac Grand Prix (VIN: 162WJ12M95F268403) 599 N.W.2d 161 Minn. 1999
  • Molberg v. Marsden 200 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1972
  • Molberg v. Marsden 200 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1972
    of Taxation, 275 Minn. 107, 112 , Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480, 485
  • State v. Jesmer 196 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1972
  • State v. Jesmer 196 N.W.2d 924 Minn. 1972
    of Taxation, 275 Minn. 107, 112 , Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480, 485
  • Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
  • Larson v. Montpetit 147 N.W.2d 580 Minn. 1966
    Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 , and Lowen v. Pates, 219 Minn. 566 , 18 N. W. (2d) 455 , wherein the testimony of police officers based on memoranda made in preparation for reports to the Highway Department was held to be within the statutory privilege, were decided prior to the 1947 amendment 18 of the statute, which stated for
  • Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 145 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1966
  • Mankato Citizens Telephone Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 145 N.W.2d 313 Minn. 1966
    Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Snuggins (8 Cir.) 103 F. (2d) 458; Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 .
  • Konkel v. Erdman 95 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1959
  • Konkel v. Erdman 95 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1959
    Defendant cites the following cases as controlling: Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 ; Thomas v. Mueller, 251 Minn. 470 , 88 N. W. (2d) 842 ; Becklund v. Daniels, 230 Minn. 442 , 42 N. W. (2d) 8 .
  • Thomas v. Mueller 88 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1958
  • Thomas v. Mueller 88 N.W.2d 842 Minn. 1958
    In Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N.W.
  • Price v. Grieger 70 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1955
  • Price v. Grieger 70 N.W.2d 421 Minn. 1955
    Therefore, the evidence was inadmissible.” See, also, Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 .
  • Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District v. City of St. Paul 61 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1953
  • Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District v. City of St. Paul 61 N.W.2d 533 Minn. 1953
    2 Caminetti v. United States, 242 U. S. 470 , 37 S. Ct. 192 , 61 L. ed. 442; W. H. Barber Co. v. City of Minneapolis, 227 Minn. 77 , 34 N. W. (2d) 710 ; Arlandson v. Humphrey, 224 Minn. 49 , 27 N. W. (2d) 819 ; City of Minneapolis v. Village of Brooklyn Center, 223 Minn. 498 , 27 N. W. (2d) 563 ; Loew v. Hagerle Brothers, 222 Minn. 258 , 24 N. W. (2d) 278 ; Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 ; State and Port Authority of St.
  • Rockwood v. Pierce 51 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1952
  • Rockwood v. Pierce 51 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 1952
    As we there pointed out, prior to the 1947 amendment we had held in Lowen v. Pates, 219 Minn. 566 , 18 N. W. (2d) 455 , and Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 , that if, to refresh his memory, reference was made by a police officer to a memorandum made at the time of the accident *531 report, the information he thus obtained was inadmissible under the statute as it then existed.
  • Garey v. Michelsen 35 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1949
  • Garey v. Michelsen 35 N.W.2d 750 Minn. 1949
    In Lowen v. Pates, 219 Minn. 566 , 18 N. W. (2d) 455 , and Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 , determined before the above amendment became effective, it was held that if, to refresh his memory, reference was made by a police officer to a memorandum made at the time of an accident report, the information thus obtained was privileged and inadmissible under § 169.09.
  • Rom v. Calhoun 34 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1948
  • Rom v. Calhoun 34 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1948
    13, which, so far as pertinent here, reads as follows: “* * * No such report or contents thereof shall be used as evidence in any trial, civil or criminal, arising out of an accident, and no person in any trial or action shall be examined or testify as to such report nor as to the making thereof or the contents thereof, *145 Hickok v. Margolis, 221 Minn. 480 , 22 N. W. (2d) 850 ; Lowen v. Pates, 219 Minn. 566 , 18 N. W. (2d) 455 .