Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Aasen v. Aasen, 36 N.W.2d 27.

41 citing documents.

Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co. 267 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1978
Scott v. Southview Chevrolet Co. 267 N.W.2d 185 Minn. 1978
See, Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , McCormick, Evidence (2 ed.) § 14.
Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp. 264 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1978
Wenner v. Gulf Oil Corp. 264 N.W.2d 374 Minn. 1978
This court in Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1, 9 , in dealing with a problem substantially similar to the case at bar and.
Toetschinger v. Ihnot 250 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1977
Kisch v. Skow 233 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 1975
Kisch v. Skow 233 N.W.2d 732 Minn. 1975
Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , Ballman v. Brinker, 211 Minn. 322 , Karalis v. Karalis, 213 Minn. 31 , 8 Note, 21 Minn. L. Rev. 823 ; 1A Dunnell, Dig.
Ramirez v. Miska 228 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1975
Ramirez v. Miska 228 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1975
Daugherty v. May Brothers Co. 265 Minn. 310 , ; Greenberg v. Holfeltz, 244 Minn. 175 , Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1
Sanchez v. Waldrup 136 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1965
Sanchez v. Waldrup 136 N.W.2d 61 Minn. 1965
Dunkelbeck v. Meyer, 140 Minn. 283 , ; Daly v. Curry, 128 Minn. 449 , ; Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 .
Schlukebier v. LaClair 127 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1964
Schlukebier v. LaClair 127 N.W.2d 693 Minn. 1964
A witness need not be an expert to estimate the speed of a moving vehicle, Daugherty v. May Brothers Co. 265 Minn. 310 , 121 N. W. (2d) 594 ; Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 , and we have held on numerous occasions that any person of reasonable intelligence and ordinary experience in life may, without proof of further qualification, express an opinion as to how fast an automobile or other moving object which has come under his observation was going at a particular time.
Ericksen v. Wilson 123 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1963
Ericksen v. Wilson 123 N.W.2d 687 Minn. 1963
See, Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 ; Bass v. Ring, 215 Minn. 11 , 9 N. W. (2d) 234 ; CaddyImler Creations, Inc. v. Caddy (9 Cir.) 299 F. (2d) 79; Minnesota Min.
Daugherty v. May Brothers Co. 121 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1963
Daugherty v. May Brothers Co. 121 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1963
Frank v. Stiegler, 250 Minn. 447 , 84 N. W. (2d) 912 ; Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 ; Moeller v. St.
Grapentin v. Harvey 114 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1962
Grapentin v. Harvey 114 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 1962
Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 .
Risnes v. Stonebreaker 110 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1961
Risnes v. Stonebreaker 110 N.W.2d 475 Minn. 1961
Frye v. Anderson, 248 Minn. 478 , 80 N. W. (2d) 593 ; Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 ; State v. One Buick Sedan Automobile, 216 Minn. 129 , 12 N. W. (2d) 1 .
Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
Floen v. Sund 96 N.W.2d 563 Minn. 1959
9 Westling v. Holm, 239 Minn. 191 , 58 N. W. (2d) 252 ; Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 .
Gruenhagen v. Brelje 89 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1958
Gruenhagen v. Brelje 89 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1958
Campbell v. Sargent, 186 Minn. 293 , ; Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 ; 20 Am.
Frye v. Anderson 80 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1957
Frye v. Anderson 80 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1957
Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 .
Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 80 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1957
Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co. 80 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1957
14 Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 .
Larson v. Degner 78 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1956
Larson v. Degner 78 N.W.2d 333 Minn. 1956
9 Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 ; Cameron v. Evans, 241 Minn. 200 , 62 N. W. (2d) 793 .
Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
Storbakken v. Soderberg 75 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1956
Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 ; Moeller v. St.
Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
Greenberg v. Holfeltz 69 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1955
8 Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1, 8 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27, 32 ; 7 Dunnell, Dig.
Stedman v. Norlin 68 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1955
Stedman v. Norlin 68 N.W.2d 393 Minn. 1955
While the fact that the Baker car was approaching from the rear would not seem to constitute a bar to the witness’s expression of his opinion as to its speed (see, Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. [2d] 27; Hayden v. Lundgren, 175 Minn. 449 , ), his own doubt as to his qualification to estimate such speed in miles per hour would indicate the trial court had not abused its discretion in rejecting his further expressions of opinion with reference thereto.
Westling v. Holm 58 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1953
Westling v. Holm 58 N.W.2d 252 Minn. 1953
Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27; Bonder *196 son v. Hovde, 150 Minn. 175 , .
Seitzer v. Halverson 42 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1950
Seitzer v. Halverson 42 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1950
Nubbe v. Hardy Continental Hotel System, 225 Minn. 496 , 31 N. W. (2d) 332 ; Aasen v. Aasen, 228 Minn. 1 , 36 N. W. (2d) 27 .