Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Weitzner v. Thingstad, 56 N.W. 817.
- HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski
812 N.W.2d 845
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
899, 901 (1917) (noting rule that “where the husband enters into a contract for the sale of his wife’s real estate, and she thereafter confirms his act, and stands ready to perform, the other party cannot take advantage of the statute to repudiate the obligations undertaken by him” (quotation omitted)); Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244, 247-48 , 56 N.W.
- Dvorak v. Maring 285 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1979
-
Dvorak v. Maring
285 N.W.2d 675
Minn. 1979
Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , 56 N.W.
- First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco 276 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
-
First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco
276 N.W.2d 30
Minn. 1979
See, e. g., Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , 256 N.W.
- Schultz v. Stiernagle 270 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1978
-
Schultz v. Stiernagle
270 N.W.2d 269
Minn. 1978
Marr v. Bradley, 239 Minn. 503 , Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , 56 N.W.
- Anderson v. First Nat. Bank of Pine City 228 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1975
-
Anderson v. First Nat. Bank of Pine City
228 N.W.2d 257
Minn. 1975
Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244
- Marr v. Bradley 59 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1953
-
Marr v. Bradley
59 N.W.2d 331
Minn. 1953
In Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244, 247 , , speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, we said: “This court has repeatedly said that conveyances and contracts to convey the homestead, executed by the husband without his wife joining therein, are not merely voidable, but wholly void.
- Simmer v. Simmer, Jr. 261 N.W. 481 Minn. 1935
-
Simmer v. Simmer, Jr.
261 N.W. 481
Minn. 1935
ct for purchase of lumber and hardware severable because in effect two separate contracts simultaneously entered into) ; Edward Thompson Co. v. Schroeder, 131 Minn. 125 , (contract for purchase of two sets of law books, each having its own price) ; Spear v. Snider, 29 Minn. 463 , (contract to dig five wells at a separately stated price for each) ; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , (husband’s contract for the sale of real estate void as to homestead because not joined in by wife held valid as
- Sherwood v. Rosenstein 228 N.W. 339 Minn. 1929
-
Sherwood v. Rosenstein
228 N.W. 339
Minn. 1929
Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , ; Lussnig v. Investors Sec.
- Horseth v. Fuglesteen 205 N.W. 607 Minn. 1925
-
Horseth v. Fuglesteen
205 N.W. 607
Minn. 1925
This was directly held in Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
- Kelly v. First State Bank of Rothsay 177 N.W. 347 Minn. 1920
-
Kelly v. First State Bank of Rothsay
177 N.W. 347
Minn. 1920
It was a lien upon his interest, though not upon his wife’s. Coles v. Yorks, 31 Minn. 213 , ; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
- Lennartz v. Montgomery 164 N.W. 899 Minn. 1917
- Stromme v. Rieck 119 N.W. 948 Minn. 1909
-
Stromme v. Rieck
119 N.W. 948
Minn. 1909
Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , ; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
- Murphy v. Renner 109 N.W. 593 Minn. 1906
-
Murphy v. Renner
109 N.W. 593
Minn. 1906
Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Conway v. Elgin, 38 Minn. 469 , ; Law v. Butler, 44 Minn. 482 , , 9 L. R. A. 856; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
- Grace v. Grace 104 N.W. 969 Minn. 1905
-
Grace v. Grace
104 N.W. 969
Minn. 1905
*297 Sections 5521, 5522, 5532, G. S. 1894; chapter 255, p. 390, Laws 1905 Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
- Schwab v. Baremore 104 N.W. 10 Minn. 1905
-
Schwab v. Baremore
104 N.W. 10
Minn. 1905
Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .