Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Weitzner v. Thingstad, 56 N.W. 817.

29 citing documents.

  • HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
  • HSBC Mortgage Services, Inc. v. Graikowski 812 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
    899, 901 (1917) (noting rule that “where the husband enters into a contract for the sale of his wife’s real estate, and she thereafter confirms his act, and stands ready to perform, the other party cannot take advantage of the statute to repudiate the obligations undertaken by him” (quotation omitted)); Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244, 247-48 , 56 N.W.
  • Dvorak v. Maring 285 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1979
  • Dvorak v. Maring 285 N.W.2d 675 Minn. 1979
    Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , 56 N.W.
  • First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco 276 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
  • First Fiduciary Corp. v. Blanco 276 N.W.2d 30 Minn. 1979
    See, e. g., Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , 256 N.W.
  • Schultz v. Stiernagle 270 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1978
  • Schultz v. Stiernagle 270 N.W.2d 269 Minn. 1978
    Marr v. Bradley, 239 Minn. 503 , Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , 56 N.W.
  • Anderson v. First Nat. Bank of Pine City 228 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1975
  • Anderson v. First Nat. Bank of Pine City 228 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1975
    Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244
  • Marr v. Bradley 59 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1953
  • Marr v. Bradley 59 N.W.2d 331 Minn. 1953
    In Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244, 247 , , speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, we said: “This court has repeatedly said that conveyances and contracts to convey the homestead, executed by the husband without his wife joining therein, are not merely voidable, but wholly void.
  • Simmer v. Simmer, Jr. 261 N.W. 481 Minn. 1935
  • Simmer v. Simmer, Jr. 261 N.W. 481 Minn. 1935
    ct for purchase of lumber and hardware severable because in effect two separate contracts simultaneously entered into) ; Edward Thompson Co. v. Schroeder, 131 Minn. 125 , (contract for purchase of two sets of law books, each having its own price) ; Spear v. Snider, 29 Minn. 463 , (contract to dig five wells at a separately stated price for each) ; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , (husband’s contract for the sale of real estate void as to homestead because not joined in by wife held valid as
  • Sherwood v. Rosenstein 228 N.W. 339 Minn. 1929
  • Sherwood v. Rosenstein 228 N.W. 339 Minn. 1929
    Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , ; Lussnig v. Investors Sec.
  • Horseth v. Fuglesteen 205 N.W. 607 Minn. 1925
  • Horseth v. Fuglesteen 205 N.W. 607 Minn. 1925
    This was directly held in Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
  • Kelly v. First State Bank of Rothsay 177 N.W. 347 Minn. 1920
  • Kelly v. First State Bank of Rothsay 177 N.W. 347 Minn. 1920
    It was a lien upon his interest, though not upon his wife’s. Coles v. Yorks, 31 Minn. 213 , ; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
  • Lennartz v. Montgomery 164 N.W. 899 Minn. 1917
  • Stromme v. Rieck 119 N.W. 948 Minn. 1909
  • Stromme v. Rieck 119 N.W. 948 Minn. 1909
    Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , ; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
  • Murphy v. Renner 109 N.W. 593 Minn. 1906
  • Murphy v. Renner 109 N.W. 593 Minn. 1906
    Barton v. Drake, 21 Minn. 299 ; Conway v. Elgin, 38 Minn. 469 , ; Law v. Butler, 44 Minn. 482 , , 9 L. R. A. 856; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
  • Grace v. Grace 104 N.W. 969 Minn. 1905
  • Grace v. Grace 104 N.W. 969 Minn. 1905
    *297 Sections 5521, 5522, 5532, G. S. 1894; chapter 255, p. 390, Laws 1905 Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
  • Schwab v. Baremore 104 N.W. 10 Minn. 1905
  • Schwab v. Baremore 104 N.W. 10 Minn. 1905
    Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .