Maxwell v. Schwartz
Cited by
- Guy v. Dictating MacHine & Record Co. 294 N.W. 877 Minn. 1940
- In Re Estate of Van Sloun 272 N.W. 261 Minn. 1937
- Kozisek v. Brigham 237 N.W. 25 Minn. 1931
- Sievert v. Selvig 222 N.W. 281 Minn. 1928
- Francis v. Knerr 182 N.W. 988 Minn. 1921
- Orr v. Sutton 148 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1914
- Whittier v. Village of Farmington 131 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1911
- W. W. Kimball Co. v. Brown 75 N.W. 1043 Minn. 1898
- Bradley v. Norris 69 N.W. 624 Minn. 1896
- Maxwell v. Capehart 64 N.W. 927 Minn. 1895
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Schleuder v. Corey 30 Minn. 501
Opinion text
Gileillan, C. J. In the court below an order was made striking out the answer as sham. From this order the defendants appealed to this court, and at the last April term the order was affirmed for *415 failure of the appellants to comply with the rule requiring the paper book and assignments of error to-be served. Judgment for plaintiff having been entered in the court below, the defendants bring this appeal therefrom. The only error claimed is in making the order •striking ont the answer. That matter is res adjudicata by the former judgment of this court, and cannot be again called in question on an appeal from the judgment. Schleuder v. Corey, 30 Minn. 501 , ( 16 N. W. 401 .) (Opinion published 57 N. W. Rep. 141 .) The judgment is affirmed, with three per cent, damages.