Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Ellis' Estate, 56 N.W. 1056.
- Watson v. Watson 57 N.W.2d 691 Minn. 1953
-
Watson v. Watson
57 N.W.2d 691
Minn. 1953
In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L. R. A. 287, involved a divorce decree obtained in a foreign state.
- Crowley v. Crowley 18 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1945
- Bull v. King 286 N.W. 311 Minn. 1939
-
Followed
Bull v. King
286 N.W. 311
Minn. 1939
Co. 104 Minn. 270 , ; In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L. R. A. 287, 43 A. S. R. 514.
- Norris v. Norris 273 N.W. 708 Minn. 1937
-
Norris v. Norris
273 N.W. 708
Minn. 1937
In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L. R. A. 287, 43 A. S. R. 514.
- Clark v. Wesendorf 275 P. 925 Ariz. 1929
- State Ex Rel. Degen v. Freeman 210 N.W. 14 Minn. 1926
- Spielman v. Molitor 210 N.W. 15 Minn. 1926
-
Spielman v. Molitor
210 N.W. 15
Minn. 1926
Smith v. Petrie, 70 Minn. 433 , ; In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L. R. A. 287, 43 Am.
- Johnson v. Kroc 194 N.W. 633 Minn. 1923
-
Johnson v. Kroc
194 N.W. 633
Minn. 1923
650, and Re Ellis Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L. R. A. 287, 43 Am.
- State ex rel. Kohlman v. Wagener 153 N.W. 749 Minn. 1915
-
State ex rel. Kohlman v. Wagener
153 N.W. 749
Minn. 1915
327, 333 , ; State v. City of Hastings, 24 Minn. 78 ; State v. Peterson, 38 Minn. 143 , ; In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L.R.A.
- Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 152 N.W. 729 Minn. 1915
-
Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
152 N.W. 729
Minn. 1915
In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L.R.A.
- Lindeke v. Scott County Co-operative Co. 148 N.W. 459 Minn. 1914
-
Lindeke v. Scott County Co-operative Co.
148 N.W. 459
Minn. 1914
In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L.R.A.
- State ex rel. Coburn v. Ries 143 N.W. 981 Minn. 1913
-
State ex rel. Coburn v. Ries
143 N.W. 981
Minn. 1913
Kipp v. Fullerton, 4 Minn. 366 (473); Cone v. Hooper, 18 Minn. 476 (531); In Re Ellis Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L.R.A.
- Sammons v. Pike 120 N.W. 540 Minn. 1909
-
Sammons v. Pike
120 N.W. 540
Minn. 1909
We did not refer in the original opinion to In re Ellis’ Estate, 55 Minn. 401 , , 23 L. R. A. 287, 43 Am.