Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Second National Bank v. Donald, 58 N.W. 269.
- Baaken v. Naufft & Bergstrom 228 N.W. 931 Minn. 1930
-
Baaken v. Naufft & Bergstrom
228 N.W. 931
Minn. 1930
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Babich v. Oliver I. Min.
- Silver v. Harbison 226 N.W. 932 Minn. 1929
-
Silver v. Harbison
226 N.W. 932
Minn. 1929
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , , and in the many cases cited in O’Leary v. Wangensteen, 175 Minn. 368 , .
- O'Leary v. Wangensteen 221 N.W. 430 Minn. 1928
-
O'Leary v. Wangensteen
221 N.W. 430
Minn. 1928
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Burud v. G. N. Ry.
- Thompson v. Schiek 213 N.W. 911 Minn. 1927
-
Thompson v. Schiek
213 N.W. 911
Minn. 1927
Bank of Winona v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Benson v. County of Marshall, 163 Minn. 309 , ; and Turner v. Gackle, 168 Minn. 514 , , defendants contend that there is nothing to contradict the testimony of Mr. and Mrs. Schiek in respect of the advancements or the understanding that the money was to be returned to the wi
- Barnard v. Seaman 211 N.W. 473 Minn. 1926
-
Barnard v. Seaman
211 N.W. 473
Minn. 1926
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , .
- Turner v. Gackle 209 N.W. 626 Minn. 1926
-
Turner v. Gackle
209 N.W. 626
Minn. 1926
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , , and Lampi v. James H. Brown Co. 165 Minn. 169 , .
- Failes v. Failes 207 N.W. 200 Minn. 1926
-
Failes v. Failes
207 N.W. 200
Minn. 1926
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , , and followed in many later cases.
- Lampi v. James H. Brown Co. 205 N.W. 953 Minn. 1925
-
Lampi v. James H. Brown Co.
205 N.W. 953
Minn. 1925
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Grover v. Bach, 82 Minn. 299 , ; Babich v. Oliver I. M. Co. 157 Minn. 122 , , .
- Flikeid v. New York Life Insurance 203 N.W. 598 Minn. 1925
-
Flikeid v. New York Life Insurance
203 N.W. 598
Minn. 1925
Bank of Winona v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Olsson v. Midland Ins.
- Klare v. Peterson 200 N.W. 817 Minn. 1924
-
Klare v. Peterson
200 N.W. 817
Minn. 1924
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , , and in Nelson v. Bullard, 155 Minn. 419 , , where the more recent cases are collated.
- Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 195 N.W. 784 Minn. 1923
-
Babich v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.
195 N.W. 784
Minn. 1923
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Campbell v. Canadian Northern Ry.
- Goedhard v. Folstad 195 N.W. 281 Minn. 1923
-
Goedhard v. Folstad
195 N.W. 281
Minn. 1923
Bank of Winona v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Grover v. Bach, 82 Minn. 299 , ; Campbell v. Canadian N. Ry.
- Nelson v. Bullard 194 N.W. 308 Minn. 1923
-
Nelson v. Bullard
194 N.W. 308
Minn. 1923
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , , Mr. Justice Mitchell stated the rule to be “That in all cases the positive testimony of an otherwise unim-peached witness can only be disregarded when its improbability or inconsistency furnishes a reasonable ground for doing so, and this improbability or inconsistency * * * must appear from facts and
- McRae v. Itasca Paper Co. 190 N.W. 72 Minn. 1922
-
McRae v. Itasca Paper Co.
190 N.W. 72
Minn. 1922
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
- Schendel v. Mundt 190 N.W. 56 Minn. 1922
-
Schendel v. Mundt
190 N.W. 56
Minn. 1922
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; Hawkins v. Sauby, 48 Minn. 69 , ; 3 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
- Geiger v. Sanitary Farm Dairies 178 N.W. 501 Minn. 1920
-
Geiger v. Sanitary Farm Dairies
178 N.W. 501
Minn. 1920
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , .
- Olsson v. Midland Insurance 165 N.W. 474 Minn. 1917
-
Olsson v. Midland Insurance
165 N.W. 474
Minn. 1917
Bank of Winona v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ; 1 Moore, Facts, § 66, et seq., and cases cited.
- Campbell v. Canadian Northern Railway Co. 144 N.W. 772 Minn. 1914
-
Campbell v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.
144 N.W. 772
Minn. 1914
Bank of Winona v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491, 493 , : “It cannot be arbitrarily disregarded by either court or jury, for reasons resting wholly in their own minds, and not based upon anything appearing on the trial.” See also Grover v. Bach, 82 Minn. 299 , .
- State v. Halverson 114 N.W. 957 Minn. 1908
-
State v. Halverson
114 N.W. 957
Minn. 1908
Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , ); but this rule does- not rest upon a presumption of law that the witness tells the truth.
- Kornig v. Western Life Indemnity Co. 112 N.W. 1039 Minn. 1907
-
Kornig v. Western Life Indemnity Co.
112 N.W. 1039
Minn. 1907
§ 904; Second National Bank v. Donald, 56 Minn. 491 , .