8658
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Lytle v. Prescott
Cited by
- Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company v. Historic Ivy Tower, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Prosser v. Manley 142 N.W. 876 Minn. 1913
- City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus Falls 128 N.W. 817 Minn. 1910
- Adams v. City of Thief River Falls 86 N.W. 767 Minn. 1901
- Rogers v. Truesdale 58 N.W. 688 Minn. 1894
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Rogers v. Truesdale 58 N.W. 688
Opinion text
Gilfillan, C. J. Of the three assignments of error the first and third are bad under the rules, — the first, because it does not show whether it is taken to the court’s findings of fact or its conclusion of law, and, if to the findings of fact, it does not show to which of them (there being several); the third, because it assigns as error the denial of the motion for a new trial, without specifying to which of the several points made by the motion the assignment applies. There is no merit in the second assignment of error. There was evidence to sustain the finding referred to in it. Order affirmed. Buck, J., absent, sick, took no part. (Opinion published 58 N. W. 688 .)