Cited by

The case of In re Seven Corners Bank, 58 Minn. 5 , , folloAvs the older rule, that one seeking to recover trust funds or property from a receiver must trace the identical fund or property into the hands of the receiver.

The case of In re Seven Corners Bank, 58 Minn. 5 , , differs from the case at bar to some extent.

5 ; In re Seven Corners Bank, 58 Minn. 5 , ; White v. Miners Nat.

Co. 58 Minn. 8 , , 49 Am.

Co., 58 Minn. 8 , , 49 Am.

Co., 58 Minn. 8 , , 49 Am.

Co., 58 Minn. 8 , , 49 Am.

P., M. & O. R. Co., 58 Minn. 8 , , 49 Am.

For the reason that the funds were so applied in payment of the other debts of the insolvent bank, the case is completely disposed of by the case of In re Seven Corners Bank, 58 Minn. 5 , ; and the city is not entitled to have the amount due it declared a lien or trust on other assets or funds in the hands of the receivers, with which the funds of the city were never commingled, and into which they never entered.

In Re Seven Corners Bank, 58 Minn. 5 , , it affirmatively appeared that the fund sought to be pursued had been paid out by the insolvent on other debts.