Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Connelly, 59 N.W. 479.

38 citing documents.

State v. Fulford 187 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1971
State v. Fulford 187 N.W.2d 270 Minn. 1971
(3 ed.) § 10352, and cases cited therein; State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , .
State v. Butenhoff 155 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1968
State v. Butenhoff 155 N.W.2d 894 Minn. 1968
See, State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , ; State v. Trocke, 127 Minn. 485 , ; State v. Anderson, supra.
State v. Anderson 137 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1965
State v. Anderson 137 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 1965
1 The problems inherent in cases of this kind have not been better stated than by Mr. Justice Mitchell in State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482, 485 , , 481: “* * * There is no rule of law which forbids a jury to convict of rape on the uncorroborated evidence of the prosecutrix, provided they are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the truth of her testimony.
State v. Schwartz 122 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1963
State v. Schwartz 122 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1963
As stated by Mr. Justice Mitchell in State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482, 486 , , where the defendant was granted a new trial after his conviction of the crime of rape on a 17-year-old girl: “The crime is so abhorrent that, to some minds, to charge a person with it, raises a presumption of guilt.
State v. Toth 7 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1943
State v. Toth 7 N.W.2d 322 Minn. 1943
State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , ; State v. Trocke, 127 Minn. 485 , ; State v. Lightheart, 153 Minn. 40 , ; State v. Maru- *150 das, 187 Minn. 188 , .
Greene v. Mathiowetz 3 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1942
Greene v. Mathiowetz 3 N.W.2d 97 Minn. 1942
Cf. State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , .
State v. Wulff 260 N.W. 515 Minn. 1935
State v. Wulff 260 N.W. 515 Minn. 1935
Particularly applicable here is the language found in State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482, 485 , , 481: ‘ “There is no rule of law which forbids a jury to convict of rape on the uncorroborated evidence of the prosecutrix, provided they are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt of the truth of her testimony.
State v. Hankins, Alias Lewis 258 N.W. 578 Minn. 1935
State v. Hankins, Alias Lewis 258 N.W. 578 Minn. 1935
Ladd v. Newell, 34 Minn. 107 , ; State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , .
State v. Marudas 244 N.W. 549 Minn. 1932
State v. Marudas 244 N.W. 549 Minn. 1932
Her testimony in the instant case was not inherently improbable as in State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , .
State v. Jenkins 213 N.W. 923 Minn. 1927
State v. Jenkins 213 N.W. 923 Minn. 1927
It is urged upon, authority of State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , , and other cases, that the evidence is insufficient.
Reidhead v. State 250 P. 366 Ariz. 1926
State v. Lightheart 189 N.W. 408 Minn. 1922
State v. Lightheart 189 N.W. 408 Minn. 1922
Although corroboration was not necessary (State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 483 , ; State v. Trocke, 127 Minn. 485 , ) there was ample evidence confirmatory of that given by complainant in tbe testimony of tbe witness Carlson.
State v. Mason 189 N.W. 452 Minn. 1922
State v. Jensen 186 N.W. 581 Minn. 1922
State v. Jensen 186 N.W. 581 Minn. 1922
State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , .
State v. Schomaker 182 N.W. 957 Minn. 1921
State v. Schomaker 182 N.W. 957 Minn. 1921
State v. Iago, 66 Minn. 231 , ; State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , .
State v. Sandquist 178 N.W. 883 Minn. 1920
State v. Sandquist 178 N.W. 883 Minn. 1920
A defendant charged with an- offense of this nature is entitled to much latitude in his cross-examination of the prosecutrix, for the accusation is easily made and the effect of her testimony is hard to overcome, State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , ; State v. Trocke, 127 Minn. 485 , , although as a general rule it is largely within the discretion of the trial court to place limits upon the cross-examination.
State v. Krantz 164 N.W. 579 Minn. 1917
State v. Krantz 164 N.W. 579 Minn. 1917
3 Greenleaf, Evidence, § 213; State v. Reid, 39 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482, 485 , ; State v. Richards, 33 Iowa, 420 ; State v. Peterson, 110 Iowa, 647 , ; Burt v. State, 23 Oh.
State v. Johnson 131 N.W. 629 Minn. 1911
State v. Johnson 131 N.W. 629 Minn. 1911
State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , ; State v. Hjerpe, 109 Minn. 270 , ; 3 Dunnell, Minn. Digest, 2.
State v. Cowing 108 N.W. 851 Minn. 1906
State v. Cowing 108 N.W. 851 Minn. 1906
See Mitchell, J., in State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , on page 486, , on page 481.
State v. Iago 68 N.W. 969 Minn. 1896
State v. Iago 68 N.W. 969 Minn. 1896
See State v. Connelly, 57 Minn. 482 , ; Matthews v. State, 19 Neb.