Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thurston v. Thurston, 59 N.W. 1017.

36 citing documents.

Grodzicki v. Quast 149 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1967
Grodzicki v. Quast 149 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1967
Plaintiff bases her claim for property settlement and support moneys upon Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , , and Searles v. Searles, 140 Minn. 385 , .
Donigan v. Donigan 53 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1952
Donigan v. Donigan 53 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1952
Bank, 243 U. S. 269 , 37 S. Ct. 282 , 61 L. ed. 713, L. R. A. 1917F, 1159; Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , ; Pye v. Magnuson, 178 Minn. 531 , ; * * As additional authority for the power of the state court to subject the property of an absent husband to payments for the support of his family under jurisdiction acquired by seizure of the property and substituted service, it was stated in Penning
Smith v. Smith 51 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1952
Smith v. Smith 51 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1952
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , .
Larsen v. Erickson 24 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1946
Larsen v. Erickson 24 N.W.2d 711 Minn. 1946
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279, 285 , .
Warner v. Warner 17 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1944
Warner v. Warner 17 N.W.2d 58 Minn. 1944
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279, 285 , .
Sheridan v. Sheridan 4 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1942
Sheridan v. Sheridan 4 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1942
The following cases are illustrative of the rule: Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , ; Searles v. Searles, 140 Minn. 385 , ; Norris v. Norris, 200 Minn. 246 , ; 39 A. L. R. 603; note, Ann. Cas.
Norris v. Norris 273 N.W. 708 Minn. 1937
Norris v. Norris 273 N.W. 708 Minn. 1937
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , ; Searles v. Searles, 140 Minn. 385 , .
Bullock v. Bullock 233 N.W. 312 Minn. 1930
Bullock v. Bullock 233 N.W. 312 Minn. 1930
Bank, 243 U. S. 269 , 37 S. Ct. 282 , 61 L. ed. 713, *566 L. R. A. 1917F, 1159; Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , ; Pye v. Magnuson, 178 Minn. 531 , ; Bragg v. Gaynor, 85 Wis.
Cairns v. Lewis 210 N.W. 885 Minn. 1926
Cairns v. Lewis 210 N.W. 885 Minn. 1926
See Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , ; Searles v. Searles, 140 Minn. 385 , .
Gummison v. Johnson 183 N.W. 515 Minn. 1921
Gummison v. Johnson 183 N.W. 515 Minn. 1921
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , .
Searles v. Searles 168 N.W. 133 Minn. 1918
Searles v. Searles 168 N.W. 133 Minn. 1918
This is the substantial effect of Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , , and the doctrine finds general though not universal support.
Roberts v. Roberts 161 N.W. 148 Minn. 1917
Roberts v. Roberts 161 N.W. 148 Minn. 1917
593; Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , .
Rose v. Rose 156 N.W. 664 Minn. 1916
Rose v. Rose 156 N.W. 664 Minn. 1916
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , .
Spencer v. Spencer 105 N.W. 483 Minn. 1906
Spencer v. Spencer 105 N.W. 483 Minn. 1906
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , .
Baier v. Baier 97 N.W. 671 Minn. 1903
Baier v. Baier 97 N.W. 671 Minn. 1903
Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , ; Almond v. Almond, 4 Rand.
Sprague v. Sprague 76 N.W. 268 Minn. 1898
Sprague v. Sprague 76 N.W. 268 Minn. 1898
■ The subject now before us — of the right of a divorced husband or wife to maintain an action for alimony — has been frequently discussed by the courts; and these discussions have led to great confusion, ending in conflicting views and results, as will appear from an examination of the cases cited in Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , , in which this court laid down some general rules in reference to the subject, but in a case wholly different from this on the facts.
Kern v. Field 71 N.W. 393 Minn. 1897
Kern v. Field 71 N.W. 393 Minn. 1897
In Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , , we held that, if the party is actually a resident of the sister state at the time he commences the action, though he has not resided in that ■state as long as its laws require before commencing the action, the judgment is valid, though irregular.
Farrell v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W. 809 Minn. 1895
Farrell v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W. 809 Minn. 1895
Bishop v. Travis, 51 Minn. 183 , ; Thurston v. Thurston, 58 Minn. 279 , .