Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Travers v. Dorr, 62 N.W. 269.

28 citing documents.

Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Morse 111 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1961
Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Morse 111 N.W.2d 620 Minn. 1961
1 Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , ; 18 Dunnell, Dig.
Allen v. Hoopes 249 N.W. 570 Minn. 1933
Allen v. Hoopes 249 N.W. 570 Minn. 1933
Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , ; Citizens State Bank v. Peters, 179 Minn. 330 , ; Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson, 188 Minn. 354 , .
Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson 247 N.W. 245 Minn. 1933
Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson 247 N.W. 245 Minn. 1933
Groesbeck v. Mattison, 43 Minn. 547 , ; Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , ; Sime v. Lewis, 112 Minn. 403 , ; Kuby v. Ryder, 114 Minn. 217 , ; A. B. Klise Lbr.
Amidon v. Traverse Land Co. 232 N.W. 33 Minn. 1930
Amidon v. Traverse Land Co. 232 N.W. 33 Minn. 1930
Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , 62 H. W. 269.
Citizens State Bank of Herscher v. Peters 229 N.W. 129 Minn. 1930
Citizens State Bank of Herscher v. Peters 229 N.W. 129 Minn. 1930
Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , ; Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Child, 76 Minn. 173 , ; Sime v. Lewis, 112 Minn. 403 , ; Kuby v. Ryder, 114 Minn. 217 , .
Minneapolis Investment Co. v. National Security Investment Co. 226 N.W. 189 Minn. 1929
Minneapolis Investment Co. v. National Security Investment Co. 226 N.W. 189 Minn. 1929
The principle was involved to some extent and discussed in Johnson v. Williams, 4 Minn. 183 (260); Groesbeck v. Mattison, 43 Minn. 547 , ; Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , ; Howard v. Burns, 73 Minn. 356 , .
Converse v. Jenson 197 N.W. 490 Minn. 1924
Converse v. Jenson 197 N.W. 490 Minn. 1924
That finding does not permit the application of the doctrine of Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , , that the duplex became the primary fund for the payment of mortgage debt and plaintiffs’ sureties, for it was their duty to free or release Jenson’s undivided one-half of the property from this very mortgage debt before he could be called to pay the balance of the purchase price.
A. B. Klise Lumber Co. v. Enkema 181 N.W. 201 Minn. 1921
A. B. Klise Lumber Co. v. Enkema 181 N.W. 201 Minn. 1921
Both parties concede that under the doctrine of Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , , and similar cases, defendant occupied the position of a surety and was released from liability on the note by the extension of time for its payment, if such extension was made without his consent.
Way v. Mooers 160 N.W. 1014 Minn. 1917
Way v. Mooers 160 N.W. 1014 Minn. 1917
336; Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , .
Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co. 158 N.W. 802 Minn. 1916
Standard Salt & Cement Co. v. National Surety Co. 158 N.W. 802 Minn. 1916
See Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , .
Kuby v. Ryder 130 N.W. 1100 Minn. 1911
Kuby v. Ryder 130 N.W. 1100 Minn. 1911
Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , .
Sime v. Lewis 128 N.W. 468 Minn. 1910
Sime v. Lewis 128 N.W. 468 Minn. 1910
The principal questions here are controlled by the decision of this court in Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , .
Clement v. Willett 117 N.W. 491 Minn. 1908
Clement v. Willett 117 N.W. 491 Minn. 1908
Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , .
Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Child 78 N.W. 1048 Minn. 1899
Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. Child 78 N.W. 1048 Minn. 1899
Travers v. Dorr, 60 Minn. 173 , .