Cited by

Society, 60 Minn. 94 , .

Society, 60 Minn. 94 , , the corporation never received the benefit of any of the proceeds of the debt there involved, and hence the holding in that case has little application to such a case as this.

60 Minn. 94 , ; Erb v. Yoerg, 64 Minn. 463 , ; Bell v. Mendenhall, 78 Minn. 57 , ; Davis v. National Cas.

60 Minn. 94 , ; Erb v. Yoerg, 64 Minn. 463 , ; Davis v. National Casualty Co. 115 Minn. 125 , ; Northland Produce Co. v. Stephens, 116 Minn. 23 , .

Kraniger v. People’s Building Society, 60 Minn. 94 , .

Society, 60 Minn. 94 , ; Rosemond v. Northwestern A. R. Co. 62 Minn. 374 , .

Co., 81 Minn. 294 , ; Kraniger v. People’s Building Society, 60 Minn. 94 , ), such rule can have no application where there is no controversy as to the purpose for which the corpora *412 tion was formed, and the disputed question is whether it was formed under the sections of the statute as found in the act of 1873, with the increased liabilities there provided for,, or under

And it was held in Kraniger v. Peoples B. Soc., 60 Minn. 94 , , that an unauthorized act of an officer of a corporation may be ratified and confirmed by the subsequent assent of all the stockholders.

Kraniger v. Peoples B. Soc., 60 Minn. 94 , ; Davis v. Old Colony, 131 Mass. 258 ; Spence v. Mobile, 79 Ala.

Kraniger v. Peoples, 60 Minn. 94 , .

Society, 60 Minn. 94 , .