9203 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Gederholm v. Davies

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed October 30, 1894 · 60 N.W. 676

Cited by

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

Collins, J. "Whether the postponement of the hearing of plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer as sham, and for judg *3 ment, was regular or irregular, the judgment appealed from must be affirmed. The order for judgment was made on default, and, before appealing to this court, it was incumbent upon defendant’s counsel to apply for relief to the court making such order. Judgment affirmed. (Opinion published 60 N. W. 676 .)