Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Swank v. St. Paul City Railway Co., 63 N.W. 1088.

42 citing documents.

Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Paul C. R. Co., 61 Minn. 423 , .” Therefore, a second suit or successive suits on the issue of title to the property are barred by the first.
Radmacher v. Cardinal 117 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1962
Radmacher v. Cardinal 117 N.W.2d 738 Minn. 1962
Co. 61 Minn. 423, 425 , , that it operates as conclusive evidence of the facts actually litigated in the first action.
In Re Trust Created by Warner 117 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1962
In Re Trust Created by Warner 117 N.W.2d 224 Minn. 1962
Co. 61 Minn. 423, 424 , , we said: “* * * Estoppel by former verdict extends only to the facts in issue and determined, and does not estop the parties from disputing the doctrines of law applied to the facts in the first suit.” In State v. P. K. M. Elec.
State v. P. K. M. Electric Co-operative, Inc. 65 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1954
State v. P. K. M. Electric Co-operative, Inc. 65 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1954
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; 10 Dunnell, Dig.
Miller v. Simons 59 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1953
Miller v. Simons 59 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 1953
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Gustafson v. Gustafson, 178 Minn. 1 , ; Wolfson v. Northern States Management Co. 221 Minn. 474 , 22 N. W. (2d) 545 ; Smith v. Smith, 235 Minn. 412 , 51 N. W. (2d) 276 ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
Schwartz v. First Trust Co. 52 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1952
Schwartz v. First Trust Co. 52 N.W.2d 290 Minn. 1952
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; 2 Pirsig’s Dunnell, Minn. Pl.
Smith v. Smith 51 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1952
Smith v. Smith 51 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 1952
Co. 61 Minn. 423, 425 , , speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, we said: “* * * counsel has failed to distinguish between estoppel by former judgment and estoppel by former verdict.
Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 36 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1949
Mitchell v. City of St. Paul 36 N.W.2d 132 Minn. 1949
Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State Bank 6 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1942
Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State Bank 6 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1942
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , ; White v. Hewitt, 119 Minn. 340 , ; Harbek v. Carpenter-Robinson Co. 123 Minn. 389 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth F. L. Co. 124 Minn. 416 , ; Eder v. Fink, 147 Minn. 438 , ; Driscoll v. Board
Holtz v. Beighley 300 N.W. 445 Minn. 1941
Holtz v. Beighley 300 N.W. 445 Minn. 1941
Clark v. Peyton 187 Minn. 155 Minn. 1932
In Re Liquidation Farmers State Bank of Claremont 244 N.W. 550 Minn. 1932
Clark v. Peyton 187 Minn. 155 Minn. 1932
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Wagener v. City of St.
In Re Liquidation Farmers State Bank of Claremont 244 N.W. 550 Minn. 1932
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , 63 N.W.
Adams v. City of Duluth 221 N.W. 8 Minn. 1928
Adams v. City of Duluth 221 N.W. 8 Minn. 1928
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; 3 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Fox v. Fox 191 N.W. 420 Minn. 1923
Fox v. Fox 191 N.W. 420 Minn. 1923
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Veline v. Dahlquist, 64 Minn. 119 , ; Kinzel v. Boston & D. F. L. Co., 124 Minn. 416 , ; Sheets v. Ramer, 125 Minn. 98 , ; Vineseck v. Great Northern Ry.
Orr v. Bennett 161 N.W. 165 Minn. 1917
Orr v. Bennett 161 N.W. 165 Minn. 1917
Clay, Robinson & Co. v. Larson 146 N.W. 1095 Minn. 1914
Clay, Robinson & Co. v. Larson 146 N.W. 1095 Minn. 1914
Sheets v. Ramer 145 N.W. 787 Minn. 1914
Sheets v. Ramer 145 N.W. 787 Minn. 1914
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 101 Minn. 93 , .
Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 145 N.W. 124 Minn. 1914
Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 145 N.W. 124 Minn. 1914
Co. 61 Minn. 423 , ; Slater v. Skirving, 51 Neb.
State ex rel. Gillilian v. Municipal Court 143 N.W. 978 Minn. 1913
State ex rel. Gillilian v. Municipal Court 143 N.W. 978 Minn. 1913
Swank v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 75 N.W. 594 Minn. 1898
Swank v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 75 N.W. 594 Minn. 1898
Veline v. Dahlquist 66 N.W. 141 Minn. 1896
Veline v. Dahlquist 66 N.W. 141 Minn. 1896
Paul C. R. Co., 61 Minn. 423 , .