Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marion v. Heimbach, 64 N.W. 386.

34 citing documents.

Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
Butch Levy Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Sallblad 126 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1964
Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; 1 Dunnell, Dig.
Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co. 111 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1961
Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co. 111 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1961
In a later case, Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , 64 N.W.
Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1959
Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc. 98 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 1959
Plaintiff points out that although it might be urged that Rye v. Phillips, 203 Minn. 567 , , 119 A. L. R. 1120, has abrogated or changed the principles of law on accord and satisfaction set forth in the leading cases of Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. Knowlton, 42 Minn. 229 , , and Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , , a close reading of the Rye case indicates that that case is no more than authority for the principle that an agreement by a creditor to accept less than the amount due on a liquidate
Davis v. Moses 215 N.W. 225 Minn. 1927
Davis v. Moses 215 N.W. 225 Minn. 1927
Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , 64 N.W.
Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Jastrow 203 N.W. 960 Minn. 1925
Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Jastrow 203 N.W. 960 Minn. 1925
Other cases, which may be noted are DeMars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 87 Minn. 413 , ; Hillestad v. Lee, 91 Minn. 335 , ; Hoidale v. Wood, 93 Minn. 190 , ; Foster County State Bank v. Lammers, 117 Minn. 94 , ; Isaacs v. Wishnick, 136 Minn. 317 , ; La Moure Co. v. C
Tupper v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance 194 N.W. 99 Minn. 1923
Tupper v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance 194 N.W. 99 Minn. 1923
It was said arguendo, in Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , , that the rule was different in such a case, but apparently that was not the view the court took in Demeules v. Jewel Tea Co. supra.
C. W. La Moure Co. v. Cuyuna-Mille Lacs Iron Co. 180 N.W. 540 Minn. 1920
C. W. La Moure Co. v. Cuyuna-Mille Lacs Iron Co. 180 N.W. 540 Minn. 1920
Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Byrnes v. Byrnes, 92 Minn. 73 , .
Sunset Orchard Land Co. v. Sherman Nursery Co. 140 N.W. 112 Minn. 1913
Sunset Orchard Land Co. v. Sherman Nursery Co. 140 N.W. 112 Minn. 1913
Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Hall v. Wheeler, 37 Minn. 522 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Hansen v. Gaar, Scott & Co. 63 Minn. 94 , .
Foster County State Bank v. Lammers 134 N.W. 501 Minn. 1912
Foster County State Bank v. Lammers 134 N.W. 501 Minn. 1912
Duluth Cham *97 ber of Commerce v. Knowlton, 42 Minn. 229 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 87 Minn. 413 , ; Byrnes v. Byrnes, 92 Minn. 73 , ; Hoidale v. Wood, 93 Minn. 190 , ; Demeules v. Jewel Tea Co. 103 Minn. 150 , , 14 L.R.A.
Wherley v. Rowe 119 N.W. 222 Minn. 1909
Wherley v. Rowe 119 N.W. 222 Minn. 1909
Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; note to Fuller v. Kemp, 20 L. R. A. 785; 1 Cyc.
Demeules v. Jewel Tea Co. 114 N.W. 733 Minn. 1908
Demeules v. Jewel Tea Co. 114 N.W. 733 Minn. 1908
Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. Knowlton, 42 Minn. 229 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co., 87 Minn. 413 , ; Byrnes v. Byrnes, 92 Minn. 73, 75 , ; Hoidale v. Wood, 93 Minn. 190 , , and cases cited in 1 Cyc.
Wright v. Lynch 112 N.W. 892 Minn. 1907
Wright v. Lynch 112 N.W. 892 Minn. 1907
Co., 37 Minn. 418 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Hansen v. Gaar, Scott & Co., 63 Minn. 94 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colo.
Hoidale v. Wood 100 N.W. 1100 Minn. 1904
Hoidale v. Wood 100 N.W. 1100 Minn. 1904
This rule was reaffirmed in Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , .
Byrnes v. Byrnes 99 N.W. 426 Minn. 1904
Byrnes v. Byrnes 99 N.W. 426 Minn. 1904
Marion v. *76 Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , .
Hillestad v. Lee 97 N.W. 1055 Minn. 1904
Hillestad v. Lee 97 N.W. 1055 Minn. 1904
• Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214, 215 , .
Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 92 N.W. 333 Minn. 1902
Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 92 N.W. 333 Minn. 1902
Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. Knowlton, 42 Minn. 229 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , .
Johnson v. Simmons 78 N.W. 863 Minn. 1899
Johnson v. Simmons 78 N.W. 863 Minn. 1899
See Duluth Chamber of C. v. Knowlton, 42 Minn. 229 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , .