9775-(44)
Precedential
Affirmed.
Processed
Shanahan v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
The holding in the court’s own words
BUCK, J. After a careful examination of all the evidénce in this case, we conclude that it comes within the rule laid down in.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Cited by
- STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. National Tea Co. 62 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1953
- Lynch v. Monarch Elevator Co. 153 N.W. 597 Minn. 1915
- Beckett v. Gridley 69 N.W. 622 Minn. 1896
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Wood v. Cullen 13 Minn. 394
- 13 Minn. 398 not in our corpus
Opinion text
BUCK, J. After a careful examination of all the evidénce in this case, we conclude that it comes within the rule laid down in. Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), which is followed. Order affirmed.