9775-(44) Precedential Affirmed. Processed

Shanahan v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed April 30, 1896 · 66 N.W. 1151

The holding in the court’s own words

BUCK, J. After a careful examination of all the evidénce in this case, we conclude that it comes within the rule laid down in.

View full opinion text ↓

Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.

Cited by

STANDARD CONSTRUCTION CO. INC. v. National Tea Co. 62 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 1953
Lynch v. Monarch Elevator Co. 153 N.W. 597 Minn. 1915
Beckett v. Gridley 69 N.W. 622 Minn. 1896

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Wood v. Cullen 13 Minn. 394
13 Minn. 398 not in our corpus

Opinion text

BUCK, J. After a careful examination of all the evidénce in this case, we conclude that it comes within the rule laid down in. Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 (434), which is followed. Order affirmed.