Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mayall v. Mayall, 65 N.W. 942.

29 citing documents.

In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of Menzel 247 Minn. 559 Minn. 1956
Bain v. Northwestern National Bank 77 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1956
In Re Trusteeship Under Last Will of Menzel 247 Minn. 559 Minn. 1956
As was pointed out in Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511, 514 , 65 N.W.
Bain v. Northwestern National Bank 77 N.W.2d 833 Minn. 1956
As was pointed out in Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511, 514 , , 943: «*- * * Even in case of an absolute sale, the trust is not destroyed.
In Re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave 31 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1948
Northwestern National Bank v. Balch 31 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1948
Northwestern National Bank v. Balch 31 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1948
For example, in Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511, 514 , , where the trust res consisted of real estate, on which the buildings had become of little value and untenantable and from which sufficient income could not be derived to pay carrying charges, with the consequence that unless sold, leased, or improved the property would be lost, but which by
In Re Trust Under Will of Cosgrave 31 N.W.2d 20 Minn. 1948
For example, in Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , 514 , 65 N.W.
Rowell v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
In Re Trust Under Will of Jones 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
Rowell v. First Minneapolis Trust Co. 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
Mayall v. Mayall, 68 Minn. 511 , ; Will of Stack, 217 Wis.
In Re Trust Under Will of Jones 22 N.W.2d 633 Minn. 1946
Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , 65 N.W.
Beliveau v. Beliveau 14 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1944
Beliveau v. Beliveau 14 N.W.2d 360 Minn. 1944
In Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511, 514 , , where there was an express trust but no power of sale, we said of a sale ordered as an exercise of the inherent equitable powers of the court: “* * * The power of the court is exercised, not to defeat or destroy the trust, but to preserve it.
Northwestern Trust Co. v. Emmet 258 N.W. 295 Minn. 1935
In Re Trust Under Will of Ferguson 258 N.W. 295 Minn. 1935
Northwestern Trust Co. v. Emmet 258 N.W. 295 Minn. 1935
Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , .
In Re Trust Under Will of Ferguson 258 N.W. 295 Minn. 1935
Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , 65 N.W.
In Re Estate of O'Connor 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
O'Connor v. St. Joseph's Provincial House 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
O'Connor v. St. Joseph's Provincial House 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , ; Estate of Boyd v. Thomas, 162 Minn. 63 , ; Douglas’s Estate, 303 Pa.
In Re Estate of O'Connor 253 N.W. 18 Minn. 1934
Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , 65 N.W.
Butler v. Butler 230 N.W. 575 Minn. 1930
Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
26 R. C. L. 1372, § 233; Watkins v. Bigelow, 93 Minn. 210 , ; Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , ; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 22 and 57, , , ; 2 Perry, Trusts & Trustees (6th ed.) § 476A, note (a).
State ex rel. Douglas v. Westfall 89 N.W. 175 Minn. 1902
State ex rel. Douglas v. Westfall 89 N.W. 175 Minn. 1902
See also *445 Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , , and Mathews v. Lightner, supra, page 333.
Mathews v. Lightner 88 N.W. 992 Minn. 1902
Mathews v. Lightner 88 N.W. 992 Minn. 1902
discuss the rule or cite authorities in support of it, for it is and has been the settled law in this state since the decision in the case of Mayall v. Mayall, 63 Minn. 511 , , which cannot be distinguished in principle from the one here under consideration.