Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stewart v. Great Northern Railway Co., 68 N.W. 208.

50 citing documents.

Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1973
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency v. Hatfield 210 N.W.2d 298 Minn. 1973
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L.R.A.
Bolin Lumber Co. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 134 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1965
Bolin Lumber Co. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 134 N.W.2d 312 Minn. 1965
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427, where we also concluded that a forced conveyance of land through the aid of statutes such as these would be unconstitutional if required for a private purpose, we must construe the statutes, if possible, so that they will not conflict with the constitution.
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF ST. PAUL v. Greenman 96 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1959
Co. 65 Minn. 515, 517 , , 33 L. R. A. 427, 429.
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; Arens v. Village of Rogers, 240 Minn. 386, 402 , 61 N. W. (2d) 508, 519 , appeal dismissed, 347 U. S. 949 , 74 S. Ct. 680 , 98 L. ed. 1096; 15 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3 ed.) § 39.19.
In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Cooperative 82 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1957
In Re Condemnation by Dairyland Power Cooperative 82 N.W.2d 56 Minn. 1957
Co. 65 Minn. 515, 517 , , 33 L. R. A. 427, 429, we said: “* * The term ‘public use’ is flexible, and cannot be limited to the public use known at the time of the forming of the constitution.” The property owners contend that this court is committed to the narrow “public use” test as enunciated in Minnesota Canal &amp
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
City of Duluth v. Northland Greyhound Lines 52 N.W.2d 774 Minn. 1952
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; Marble v. Oliver I. Min.
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Thomas v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority of Duluth 48 N.W.2d 175 Minn. 1951
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427.
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; Bender v. City of Fergus Falls, 115 Minn. 66 , ; State ex rel.
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Erickson 239 N.W. 908 Minn. 1931
Marble v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 215 N.W. 71 Minn. 1927
Marble v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 215 N.W. 71 Minn. 1927
co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; *265 Bender v. City of Fergus Falls, 115 Minn. 66 , ; State ex rel.
Sundquist v. Fraser 191 N.W. 931 Minn. 1923
Sundquist v. Fraser 191 N.W. 931 Minn. 1923
Stewart v. Great Northern R. Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427, in wholly foreign to the question here presented.
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pioneer Fuel Co. 181 N.W. 341 Minn. 1921
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Pioneer Fuel Co. 181 N.W. 341 Minn. 1921
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L.R.A.
Simmons v. Northern Pacific Railroad 180 N.W. 114 Minn. 1920
Simmons v. Northern Pacific Railroad 180 N.W. 114 Minn. 1920
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L.R.A.
State ex rel. Twin City Building & Investment Co. v. Houghton 174 N.W. 885 Minn. 1919
State v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 168 N.W. 180 Minn. 1918
State v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 168 N.W. 180 Minn. 1918
Co. 65 *443 Minn. 515 , , 33 L.R.A.
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Ford Motor Co. v. District Court of Fourth Judicial District 158 N.W. 240 Minn. 1916
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L.R.A.
Webb v. Lucas 147 N.W. 273 Minn. 1914
Webb v. Lucas 147 N.W. 273 Minn. 1914
Co. 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L.R.A.
Mueller v. Supervisors of Courtland 135 N.W. 996 Minn. 1912
Mueller v. Supervisors of Courtland 135 N.W. 996 Minn. 1912
Co. 65 Minn. 515, 517 , , 33 L.R.A.
State v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 131 N.W. 859 Minn. 1911
State v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 131 N.W. 859 Minn. 1911
*55 Co. 65 Minn. 515, 517 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; State v. Willmar & S. F. Ry.
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
Co., 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; State v. Smith, 58 Minn. 35 , , 25 L. R. A. 759; State v. Chapel, 64 Minn. 130 , , 32 L. R. A. 131, 58 Am.
Budds v. Frey 117 N.W. 158 Minn. 1908
Budds v. Frey 117 N.W. 158 Minn. 1908
Co., 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; Jaeger v. Sunde, 70 Minn. 356 , ; Bell v. Mendenhall, 71 Minn. 331 , ; Anderson v. W. J. Dyer & Bro., 94 Minn. 33 , .
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Pratt 112 N.W. 395 Minn. 1907
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Pratt 112 N.W. 395 Minn. 1907
Co., 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; Charleston v. Rowe, 52 W. Va.
James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 107 N.W. 742 Minn. 1906
James Quirk Milling Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 107 N.W. 742 Minn. 1906
Co., 65 Minn. 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427.
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
Co., 65 Minn. *437 515 , , 33 L. R. A. 427; Fairchild v. City of St.
State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County Commissioners 92 N.W. 216 Minn. 1902
State ex rel. Utick v. Board of County Commissioners 92 N.W. 216 Minn. 1902
Co., 65 Minn. 515 , , should be applied.
Fohl v. Common Council of Village of Sleepy Eye Lake 82 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1900
Fohl v. Common Council of Village of Sleepy Eye Lake 82 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1900
Co., 65 Minn. 515 , ; Knoblauch v. City of Minneapolis, 56 Minn. 321 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by