Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gillespie v. Gillespie, 67 N.W. 206.

27 citing documents.

Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Newton 646 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. Newton 646 N.W.2d 888 Minn. Ct. App. 2002
Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381, 383 , 67 N.W.
Abrahamson v. Abrahamson 613 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Abrahamson v. Abrahamson 613 N.W.2d 418 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381, 383 , 67 N.W.
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc. 262 N.W.2d 377 Minn. 1977
See, Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , 67 N.W.
Burns v. Stewart 188 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1971
Burns v. Stewart 188 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1971
Rich v. Rich, 12 Minn. 369 (468); Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , ; Muus v. Muus, 29 Minn. 115 , .
Pelowski v. Frederickson 116 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1962
Pelowski v. Frederickson 116 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1962
For decisions in other than tort actions where the doctrine of marital immunity has not prevented suits between spouses, see Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , ; Baier v. Baier, 91 Minn. 165 , ; Rich v. Rich, 12 Minn. 369 (468); Muus v. Muus, 29 Minn. 115 , ; see, also, McCurdy, Torts Between Persons in Domestic Relations, 43 Harv.
Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , .
Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , 67 N.W.
Archer v. Moulton 236 N.W. 455 Minn. 1931
Archer v. Moulton 236 N.W. 455 Minn. 1931
Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , ; Eilers v. Conradt, 39 Minn. 242 , , 12 A. S. R. 641; see also France v. France, 38 Misc.
State v. Arnold 235 N.W. 373 Minn. 1931
State v. Arnold 235 N.W. 373 Minn. 1931
In the case of Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , 383 , 67 N.W.
State Elevator Co. v. Great Northern Railway Co. 158 N.W. 399 Minn. 1916
Co. 64 Minn. 369 , ; Philips v. Mo, 91 Minn. 311 , ; Humphrey v. Monida & Yellowstone Stage Co. 115 Minn. 18 , .
Farmers Elevator Co. of Lansford v. Great Northern Railway Co. 154 N.W. 954 Minn. 1915
Twitchell v. Cummings 143 N.W. 785 Minn. 1913
Twitchell v. Cummings 143 N.W. 785 Minn. 1913
Paul & Sioux City R. Co. 22 Minn. 34 ; Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , .
John S. Bradstreet Co. v. Four Traction Auto Co. 137 N.W. 180 Minn. 1912
Co. 64 Minn. 369 , , Mr. Justice Mitchell said: “The general rule is that evidence of collateral facts is inadmissible.
Grace v. Grace 104 N.W. 969 Minn. 1905
Grace v. Grace 104 N.W. 969 Minn. 1905
It is also true that in many cases it has been held by this court that “the clearly declared policy of the statute in respect to the relation of husband and wife is that the latter can, in her own name and in any form of action, sue the former to enforce any right affecting her property, the same as if he were a stranger.” Gillespie v. Gillespie, 64 Minn. 381 , ; Frankel v. Frankel, 173 Mass. 214 , note; Spencer v. St.
Philips v. Mo 97 N.W. 969 Minn. 1904
Co., 64 Minn. 369 , ; Glassberg v. Olson, 89 Minn. 195 , .
Glassberg v. Olson 94 N.W. 554 Minn. 1903

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by