Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co., 68 N.W. 53.

39 citing documents.

Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc. 628 N.W.2d 142 Minn. 2001
at 600 ; see also Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co., 65 Minn. 196, 209 , 68 N.W.
Pike v. Gunyou 488 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Villars v. Provo 440 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
Villars v. Provo 440 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
for rev. denied (Minn. May 16, 1986) (clause “was aimed against the corrupt practice of taking bribes and exacting illegal fees in the administration of justice, and never meant that a litigant should have the right to conduct his suit in court without cost”) (quoting Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co., 65 Minn. 196, 208 , 68 N.W.
State v. Hamm 423 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1988
State v. Hamm 423 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1988
Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co., 65 Minn. 196, 209 , 68 N.W.
Proetz v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 382 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Proetz v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners 382 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Company, 65 Minn. 196 , 68 N.W.
Johnson v. Holzemer 116 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1962
Johnson v. Holzemer 116 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1962
593.01; Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196 , .
Leighton v. Abell 31 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1948
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
Louis, 117 Minn. 42 , ; Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196 , , 33 A. L. R. 437, 60 A. S. R. 450; Curryer v. Merrill, 25 Minn. 1 , 33 Am.
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
299 ; Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196 , 68 N.W.
State v. Rosenberg 192 N.W. 194 Minn. 1923
State v. Rosenberg 192 N.W. 194 Minn. 1923
Unless otherwise provided, “the jury must consist of 12; they must be impartial and indifferent between the parties; and their verdict must be unanimous.” Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196, 209 , , 33 L. R. A. 437, 60 Am.
Dohs v. Holm 189 N.W. 418 Minn. 1922
Dohs v. Holm 189 N.W. 418 Minn. 1922
Rippe v. Becker, 56 Minn. 100 -118, , 22 L. R. A. 857; Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196 -208, , 33 L. R. A. 437, 60 Am.
Brown v. Smallwood 153 N.W. 953 Minn. 1915
State ex rel. Kohlman v. Wagener 153 N.W. 749 Minn. 1915
State ex rel. Kohlman v. Wagener 153 N.W. 749 Minn. 1915
450 ; Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196, 208 , , 33 L.R.A.
Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 148 N.W. 71 Minn. 1914
Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 148 N.W. 71 Minn. 1914
498 ; Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196 , , 33 L.R.A.
Farrell v. Hicken 147 N.W. 815 Minn. 1914
Farrell v. Hicken 147 N.W. 815 Minn. 1914
Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196, 207 , , 33 L.R.A.
Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
were intended to be embraced within this article.’ This is the best definition that we have found of the classes of cases to which the trial- by jury is secured; for it makes the right to such a trial depend on the nature and character of the controversy, and not on the form of action or proceeding in which it is to be determined.” Again, the rule, as stated in Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co. 65 Minn. 196, 209 , ( 33 L.R.A.
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co., 65 Minn. 196 , , 33 L. R. A. 431, 60 Am.
City of Minneapolis v. Janney 90 N.W. 312 Minn. 1902
City of Minneapolis v. Janney 90 N.W. 312 Minn. 1902
Lommen v. Minneapolis Gaslight Co., 65 Minn. 196, 207 , .
State ex rel. Styve v. Kingsley 88 N.W. 742 Minn. 1902
State ex rel. Styve v. Kingsley 88 N.W. 742 Minn. 1902
What “trial by jury” is has been well stated in Lommen v. Minneapolis G. Co., 65 Minn. 196, 209 , : “What is ‘trial by jury,’ to which the constitution refers?
Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co. 77 N.W. 38 Minn. 1898
Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co. 77 N.W. 38 Minn. 1898
Lommen v. Minneapolis Gas L. Co., 65 Minn. 196 .
Riley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 69 N.W. 718 Minn. 1897
Riley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 69 N.W. 718 Minn. 1897
Lommen v. Minneapolis G. Co., 65 Minn. 196 , .