Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lussier v. State, 821 N.W.2d 581.

227 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Thomas Joseph McManus Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Laura Barreto Renteria v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Laura Barreto Renteria v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Mohammed Mohammed Ali Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (“[W]e have cautioned against the use of exclusively leading questions to establish a proper factual basis for a guilty plea.”); Ecker, d at 717 (“[W]e again discourage the use of leading questions to establish a factual basis.”).
State of Minnesota v. Todd Eugene Trahan Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Todd Eugene Trahan Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
Frank Duane Lussier v. State of Minnesota 853 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Eugene Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
John Patrick Murphy v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Robert Earl Pittman, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Anthony Eugene Quinn Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that “the plea petition and colloquy may be supplemented by other evidence to establish the factual basis for a plea,” including the complaint).
John Patrick Murphy v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
We will reverse a decision of the postconviction court only if that court abused its discretion.” (quotation omitted).
Michael Cordale Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Cordale Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
only if that court abused its discretion.” (quotation omitted).
Dion Dalvante Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Dion Dalvante Harris v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Evalyn Lia Bheaanu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Evalyn Lia Bheaanu Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Staunton v. State 842 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 2014
Staunton v. State 842 N.W.2d 3 Minn. 2014
Act of June 2, 2005, ch. 136, art. 14, § 13, 2005 Minn. Laws 901 , 1097-98
Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
Hooper v. State 838 N.W.2d 775 Minn. 2013
583 n. 1 (Minn.2012) (declining to address “whether the statute of limitations set forth in Minn.Stat.
Vazquez v. State 822 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Vazquez v. State 822 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2012

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by