Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church, 672 N.W.2d 13.

85 citing documents.

State v. Curtis 921 N.W.2d 342 Minn. 2018
21, 2010); Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church , , 20 (Minn. App. 2003) ("This court is bound by decision[s] of the Minnesota Supreme Court...."); House v. Sports Films & Talents, Inc. , , 685 (Minn. App. 1984) (same).
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Lori Swanson, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church , (recognizing that federal caselaw, while not binding, may be persuasive and should be awarded “due deference”).
Damian Loth, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jeremia Joseph Loper, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Minn. Sch. of Bus., Inc. 915 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Minn. Sch. of Bus., Inc. 915 N.W.2d 903 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Citizens for a Balanced City v. Plymouth Congregational Church , , 20 (Minn. App. 2003) (noting that while not binding, federal caselaw may be persuasive).
Favors v. Kneisel 902 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Favors v. Kneisel 902 N.W.2d 92 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Citizens for a (Minn.App.
Randall v. Paul 897 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Randall v. Paul 897 N.W.2d 842 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(state statute); Citizens for a (federal statute).
Vermillion State Bank v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation 895 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vermillion State Bank v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation 895 N.W.2d 269 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Standing is acquired when a party has suffered some injury-in-fact or when a party is the beneficiary of some legislative enactment granting standing.” Citizens for a (quotation omitted).
TCI Business Capital, Inc. v. Five Star American Die Casting, LLC, Brian T. Flynn 890 N.W.2d 423 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing and to Submit … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing and to Submit … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Standing may be acquired “when a party is the beneficiary of some legislative enactment granting standing.” Citizens for a (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Tressa Lee Bissonette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tressa Lee Bissonette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
However, “[t]his court is bound by decision[s] of the Minnesota Supreme Court.” Citizens for a
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joshua Royce Holmquist. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Joshua Royce Holmquist. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel 874 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel 874 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
First, we identify the circumstances Church, (noting that we are bound only by Minnesota Supreme Court and United States Supreme Court decisions).
In the Matter of the Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Luke's Hospital, North … 867 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Consolidated Hospital Surcharge Appeals of Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, St. Luke's Hospital, North … 867 N.W.2d 513 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See Citizens for a aff’d, Jendro v. Honeywell, Inc., n.1 (Minn. App. 1986).
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Standing is acquired when a party has suffered some ‘injury-in-fact’ or when a party is the beneficiary of some legislative enactment granting standing.” Citizens for a (emphasis omitted).
Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 859 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Save Mille Lacs Sportsfishing, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 859 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
its threatened application, interferes with or impairs, or threatens to interfere with or impair the legal rights or privileges of the petitioner.” Minnesota courts have held that “Standing is acquired when a party has suffered some ‘injury-in-fact’ or when a party is the beneficiary of some legislative enactment granting standing.” Citizens for a (citing Philip Morris Inc., d at 493 ).
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Sergey Porada, Yelena Kurdyumova v. Terry I. Monroe, Marc L. Kruger Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, e.g., Citizens for a d 13, 19 (Minn. App. 2003).
Ivan Ray Vaughan v. Wade Setter, Superintendant, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Ivan Ray Vaughan v. Wade Setter, Superintendant, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Citizens for a (“When a party does not have standing, a court does not have jurisdiction to hear the matter.”).
Simmons v. Fabian 743 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Simmons v. Fabian 743 N.W.2d 281 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Matter of Hildebrandt 701 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re Matter of Hildebrandt 701 N.W.2d 293 Minn. Ct. App. 2005