Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood, 683 N.W.2d 267.

113 citing documents.

Marriage of Grachek v. Grachek 750 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
(stating that, when interpreting a written instrument, “the intent of the parties is determined from the plain language of the instrument itself’); see also Ideal Mut.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP v. Grossman 749 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
When interpreting a written instrument, “the intent of the parties is determined from the plain language of the instrument itself.”
Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. Western National Insurance Co. 744 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Star Windshield Repair, Inc. v. Western National Insurance Co. 744 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
*242 We hold that the issue on appeal is controlled by the Minnesota Supreme Court’s
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. 741 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2007
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. 741 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2007
“Contract interpretation is a question of law which we review de novo.”
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“[W]hen a contractual provision is clear and unambiguous, courts should not rewrite, modify, or limit its effect by a strained construction.”
In Re Glaxosmithkline Plc. 732 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 2007
In Re Glaxosmithkline Plc. 732 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 2007
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 728 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 2007
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 728 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 2007