Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hauschildt v. Beckingham, 686 N.W.2d 829.
-
Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue
853 N.W.2d 102
Minn. 2013
Although the doctrine of res judicata should not be applied rigidly in contravention of public policy, the doctrine “reflects courts’ disfavor with multiple lawsuits for the same cause of action and wasteful litigation,” Wilson, d at 198 .
- State v. Castillo-Alvarez 820 N.W.2d 601 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
-
State v. Castillo-Alvarez
820 N.W.2d 601
Minn. Ct. App. 2012
see also Aufderhar v. Data Dispatch, Inc., (holding that Minnesota does not require mutuality of parties “as a predicate to the invocation of collateral estoppel,” provided the other elements of the defense have been met).
- Kern v. Janson 800 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2011
- Kern v. Janson 800 N.W.2d 126 Minn. 2011
- Rucker v. Schmidt 794 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2011
- Rucker v. Schmidt 794 N.W.2d 114 Minn. 2011
- Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc. 792 N.W.2d 836 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Curtis v. Altria Group, Inc.
792 N.W.2d 836
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“Whether collateral estoppel precludes litigation of an issue is a mixed question of law and fact that we review de novo.”
- Rucker v. Schmidt 768 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- Rucker v. Schmidt 768 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
- State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
- Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
- Larson v. Wasemiller 738 N.W.2d 300 Minn. 2007
- State v. Lemmer 736 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
- State v. Lemmer 736 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
- Augustine v. Arizant Inc. 735 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Augustine v. Arizant Inc. 735 N.W.2d 740 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co. 732 N.W.2d 209 Minn. 2007
- Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 728 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 2007
- Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 728 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 2007
- Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 725 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Milner v. Farmers Insurance Exchange 725 N.W.2d 138 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc. 716 N.W.2d 394 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Nelson v. Short-Elliot-Hendrickson, Inc.
716 N.W.2d 394
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Res judicata involves circumstances that give rise to a claim and precludes a second claim for the same cause of action “not only as to every matter which was actually litigated, but also as to every matter which might have been litigated therein.” (quotation omitted).
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., P.L.L.P. 715 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Brown-Wilbert, Inc. v. Copeland Buhl & Co., P.L.L.P. 715 N.W.2d 484 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
- Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 706 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
- Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 706 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005