Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of M.E.M., 674 N.W.2d 208.

35 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A. S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. A. S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. K. B.-W., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence the court applies the same standard to bench and jury trials.” d 208, 215 (Minn. App. 2004).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. L., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re A.J.B. 910 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re A.J.B. 910 N.W.2d 491 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
THE DEFENDANT: No. Lavan argues that this exchange was insufficient to establish that he knowingly, intell igently, and voluntarily waived his right to a jury trial.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D.N.W., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of: D.N.W., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
This court must assume that the fact-finder believed the state’s witnesses and disbelieved any contrary evidence.” (quotation and citation omitted); (stating that the same standard of review applies to court trials and jury trials).
Dennis Bernard Freeman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Dennis Bernard Freeman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
When considering a claim of insufficient evidence we “view[] the evidence in the light most 3 favorable to the state and decide[] whether the fact-finder could have reasonably found the defendant guilty.”
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Edward Nixon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Daniel Edward Nixon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The first prong of the test is whether the procedure “was unnecessarily suggestive.” -15 (Minn. App. 2004) (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Ashad Jemeir Mayo Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ashad Jemeir Mayo Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Appellant relies on (concluding that the admission of evidence on the defendant’s identification was not clearly erroneous, although the defendant was “singled out” for presentation to the have been misidentified, but he does not address the fact that no other persons or bicycles of any description were seen ne
State of Minnesota v. Alfonso Domingo Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alfonso Domingo Martinez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tony Don Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. S. G. B., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of: T. S. G. B., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Levon Spraggins, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of: G. A. H., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of: G. A. H., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jason Paul Krieg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jason Paul Krieg Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Ehmke 752 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Ehmke 752 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In addition, we note that the presumption of such an implied waiver does not apply to a “trial [under rule 26.01] in which the waiver to testify must be in writing or on the record.” In re Welfare of
In Re the Welfare of C.J.W.J. 699 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Welfare of C.J.W.J. 699 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 2005