Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of the Children of R.W., 678 N.W.2d 49.

181 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. W. N. and J. L. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. M. A. and M. R. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. S. H. and X. L. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re Staat, 287 Minn. 501, 506
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. S. and M. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“[R]easonable efforts, by definition, do[] not include efforts that would be futile.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
(“Termination of parental rights will be affirmed as long as at least one statutory ground for termination is supported by clear and convincing evidence and termination is in the child’s best interests.”).
In re the Welfare of the Children of K.S.F. 823 N.W.2d 656 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In Re Welfare of Children of D.M.T.-r. 802 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In Re Welfare of Children of D.M.T.-r. 802 N.W.2d 759 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
1(b)(6); (standard of proof).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of A.I. 779 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
In Re the Welfare of the Children of A.I. 779 N.W.2d 886 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(affirming termination under subdivision 1(b)(8), inter alia, because efforts made to become a viable parent while in prison would have been insufficient whether he was in prison or not); Vasquez, d at 253 (holding, under subdivision 1(b)(5), that incarceration was, relevant but not dispositiv
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
And we will affirm the district court’s termination of parental rights if “at least one statutory ground for termination is supported by clear and convincing evidence and termination is in the child’s best interests.”
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
In Re Welfare of Children of N.F. 735 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re Welfare of Children of N.F. 735 N.W.2d 735 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
27, (2001)); (stating that questions of law, such as the interpretation of the statutory criteria for adjudicating a CHIPS petition, are reviewed de novo).
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D. 731 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D. 731 N.W.2d 548 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
1(b) (2006) (listing grounds for involuntary termination of parental rights); In re Welfare *554 of the Children of R.W., (stating that only one statutory basis is needed to support termination).
In Re the Children of T.A.A. 702 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2005
In Re the Children of T.A.A. 702 N.W.2d 703 Minn. 2005
State v. McCoy 682 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2004
State v. McCoy 682 N.W.2d 153 Minn. 2004