DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Opsahl v. State, 677 N.W.2d 414.

320 citing documents.

  • State v. Turnage 729 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 2007
    Opsahl v. State (Opsahl II)
  • Francis v. State 729 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2007
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); -21 (Minn.2004).
  • Wilson v. State 726 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2007
  • Wilson v. State 726 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 2007
    Opsahl v. State (Opsahl II)
  • Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
  • Erickson v. State 725 N.W.2d 532 Minn. 2007
    445 *535 (Minn.2006); (“Because claims of ineffective assistance of counsel involve mixed questions of law and fact, our review of decisions by the postconviction court is de novo”).
  • Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
  • Schleicher v. State 718 N.W.2d 440 Minn. 2006
    The reasonableness of counsel’s performance is judged by an objective standard of “representation by an attorney exercising the customary skills and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would perform under similar circumstances.” (internal quotation marks omitted).
  • White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
  • White v. State 711 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2006
  • Opsahl v. State 710 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
  • Opsahl v. State 710 N.W.2d 776 Minn. 2006
    Opsahl v. State (Opsahl II)
  • State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Blanche 696 N.W.2d 351 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Martin 695 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2005
  • State v. Martin 695 N.W.2d 578 Minn. 2005
    2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)
  • Carney v. State 692 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 2005
  • Williams v. State 692 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2005
  • Carney v. State 692 N.W.2d 888 Minn. 2005
  • Williams v. State 692 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 2005
    -23 (Minn.2004) (applying Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82, 87-88 (7th Cir.1928), overruled by United States v. Mitrione, 357 F.3d 712, 718 (7th Cir.2004) (modifying rule in Larrison)).