Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc., 685 N.W.2d 12.
- Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State Patrol 9 N.W.3d 368 Minn. 2024
-
Christina Berrier v. Minnesota State Patrol
9 N.W.3d 368
Minn. 2024
Rather, an amicus “must accept the case before the court with the issues made by the parties” and “ordinarily cannot inject new issues into a case that have not been presented by the parties.” Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc., n.9 (Minn. 2004).
-
A18-1953 A18-1958 A18-1959 A18-1960 A18-1961
Minn. 2021
Amicus must accept the case before the court as it is and “ordinarily cannot inject new issues into a case that have not been pr esented by the parties.” Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc., n.9 (Minn. 2004).
-
R e s p o n d e n t ,
Minn. 2021
Servs., –63 (Iowa 2018) (Appel, J., dissen ting), we typically do not reach issues raised on ly by amici, Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc. , n.9 (Minn. 2004).
-
Rodrigo Esparza, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Generally, “an amicus must accept the case before the court with the issues made by the parties, [thus] an amicus ordinarily cannot inject new issues into a case that have not been presented by the parties.” Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc., n.9 (Minn. 2004).
- Allan v. R.D. Offutt Co. 869 N.W.2d 31 Minn. 2015
- State v. Williams 842 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 2014
-
State v. Williams
842 N.W.2d 308
Minn. 2014
Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.
- Dykhoff v. Xcel Energy 840 N.W.2d 821 Minn. 2013
- League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie 819 N.W.2d 636 Minn. 2012
-
League of Women Voters Minnesota v. Ritchie
819 N.W.2d 636
Minn. 2012
We may, however, decide issues raised solely by an amicus "particularly if the issue is one the court could raise sua sponte.” Kline v. Berg Dtywall, Inc., , 23-24 n. 9 (Minn.2004) (deciding whether our court had jurisdiction over a dispute, even though the jurisdictional challenge was raised solely by an amicus).
- Anderson v. Frontier Communications 819 N.W.2d 143 Minn. 2012
- Beuning Family LP v. County of Stearns 817 N.W.2d 122 Minn. 2012
- Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc. 783 N.W.2d 144 Minn. 2010
-
Seehus v. Bor-Son Construction, Inc.
783 N.W.2d 144
Minn. 2010
The workers’ compensation adjudication system is “based to a significant extent on the judicial model of decision-making.” Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc., (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
- In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem 742 N.W.2d 422 Minn. 2007
-
In Re the Civil Commitment of Giem
742 N.W.2d 422
Minn. 2007
Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.
- Heine v. Simon 702 N.W.2d 752 Minn. 2005
-
Heine v. Simon
702 N.W.2d 752
Minn. 2005
Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.
- Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 698 N.W.2d 408 Minn. 2005
-
Mayo Collaborative Services, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue
698 N.W.2d 408
Minn. 2005
“The presumption is that a statute is constitutional, and we are required to place a construction on the statute that will find it so if at all possible.” Kline v. Berg Drywall, Inc.
- State v. Hartmann 700 N.W.2d 449 Minn. 2005