Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite James v. State, 699 N.W.2d 723.

102 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Sheikh Nyane Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled.” (quotation omitted) (stating that the government’s breach of such a promise violates due process).
James Darnell Posey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James Darnell Posey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
We review the interpretation and enforcement of plea agreements de novo, but “[d]etermining what the parties agreed to in a plea bargain is a factual inquiry for the postconviction court to resolve.” (quotation omitted).
Francisco Herrera Sanchez v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Francisco Herrera Sanchez v. State of Minnesota 868 N.W.2d 282 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Danny Lee Zinski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kodjo Agbelengeor Anyide-Ocloo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kodjo Agbelengeor Anyide-Ocloo v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
see Minn. Stat. § 590.01 (2014).
Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 2015
Jacob Stephen Brown v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 781 Minn. 2015
We have held that “[w]hen a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea under Rule 15.05, after the defendant has been sentenced, the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
Hector Martinez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Hector Martinez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeremy Shane Zimmermann v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Jeremy Shane Zimmermann v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When a plea rests in any significant degree on a promise or agreement of the prosecutor, so that it can be said to be part of the inducement or consideration, such promise must be fulfilled.” (alteration and quotation omitted).
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that when a defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea after sentencing, the defendant must raise it in a petition for postconviction relief).
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robyn Lynn Hager v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” ( (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Alan Alberto Zamora Morales v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Alan Alberto Zamora Morales v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Harold David Yaritz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Harold David Yaritz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“When a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a guilty plea under Rule 15.05, after the defendant has been sentenced, the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven Daniel Waldor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Steven Daniel Waldor v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (reasoning that plea agreement was induced by unfulfillable promise because defendant was not made aware of applicable mandatory conditional-release term when he entered his guilty plea or when he was sentenced and concluding therefore that plea agreement was not knowingly and understandingly mad
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Charles Chuck Jackson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
16, 1984); (stating that when delay is deliberate and inexcusable, constituting an abuse of the judicial process, there is a sufficient basis to justify denial of relief solely on the basis that the petition is untimely).
Uselman v. State 831 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Uselman v. State 831 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Vazquez v. State 822 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Vazquez v. State 822 N.W.2d 313 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
We note that the supreme court has held that, when a defendant seeks to withdraw his guilty plea after sentencing, “the motion to withdraw the plea must be raised in a petition for postconviction relief.”
Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
Carlton v. State 816 N.W.2d 590 Minn. 2012
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Lopez 794 N.W.2d 379 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
State v. Batchelor 786 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Batchelor 786 N.W.2d 319 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests “in any significant degree” on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise, “including a promise of a sentence unauthorized by law.” -29 (Minn.2005) (quotations omitted).
Oldenburg v. State 763 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Oldenburg v. State 763 N.W.2d 655 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
-20 (Minn.2003); -73 (Minn.2000)
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Williams v. State 760 N.W.2d 8 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“The voluntariness requirement insures that a guilty plea is not entered because of any improper pressures or inducements.” (quotation omitted).
State v. Hughes 758 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2008
State v. Hughes 758 N.W.2d 577 Minn. 2008
State v. Jedlicka 747 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Jedlicka 747 N.W.2d 580 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-28 (Minn.2005), the supreme court considered the merits of a postconvietion petition to challenge a *585 plea where the petition was filed 39 months after conviction, but the petitioner had not been informed of a statutorily-required term of conditional release at the time of the plea.
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
The court has also found manifest injustice when the defendant agreed to a specific sentence but did not receive notice until after sentencing that a conditional release term would be imposed, -30 (Minn.2005), when the defendant and the state were mutually mistaken as to the defendant’s criminal history score, -35 (Minn. 1988), and when the district court declines to give a plea agreement effect, State v. Loyd, 291 Minn. 528, 531