Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Kier, 678 N.W.2d 672.

70 citing documents.

James Fletcher Cameron v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Matthew Allan White v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
14, 2004); (“Common indicia of intoxication include an odor of alcohol, .
James Fletcher Cameron v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. June 15, 2004).
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Yee Leng Vue Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence.” d 672, 678 (Minn. App. 2004) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. June 15, 2004).
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Roy Horvath Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Roy Horvath Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Pendleton, d at 731; (stating that “[a]n officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence”).
Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2014
16, 1996); (“An officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence.”).
State of Minnesota v. Gary Richard Wessman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Gary Richard Wessman Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Wessman is correct that the district court must consider factors that may justify a departure, but he wrongly implies that it must discuss every factor on the record before imposing a presumptive sentence
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Steven Pettinelli Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, (stating that “[a]n officer needs only one objective indication of intoxication to constitute probable cause to believe a person is under the influence”); (“An admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is suf
State v. Rivers 787 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Rivers 787 N.W.2d 206 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
(stating that the sentencing guidelines do not apply to gross-misdemeanor offenses).
State v. Holmes 719 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 2006
State v. Holmes 719 N.W.2d 904 Minn. 2006
Guidelines I, and draws a contrast between the court of appeals’ 42-month sentence for Holmes and the consecutive 66-month felony sentence and 12--76 (Minn.App.2004) (consecutive felony and gross misdemeanor sentences imposed as part of the same behavioral incident), rev. denied (Minn. June 15, 2004).
State v. Holmes 701 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
State v. Holmes 701 N.W.2d 267 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
The state accu *273 for the proposition that the guidelines do not apply to misdemeanor and gross-misdemeanor sentences.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by