Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Termination of the Parental Rights of Tanghe, 672 N.W.2d 623.

131 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C.L.T. and J.T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B.B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(holding that a district court must consider the child’s best interests and address those interests in its findings of fact and conclusions of law).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
20 whether one of the nine statutorily-defined bases for termination is present, a district court must also consider whether termination of parental rights is in the children’s best interests and “explain its rationale in its findings and conclusions.” Minn. Stat. § 260C.301, subd.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. J., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. J., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. A. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. A. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
‘an appellate court’s combing through the record to determine best interests is inappropriate because it involves credibility determinations.’” ().
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. L. v. and B. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“An order terminating parental rights must explain the district court’s rationale for concluding why termination is in the best interests of the child[.]”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. J. M. and R. D. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. A. S. and R. L. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L. 801 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.L.L. 801 N.W.2d 405 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
-26 (Minn.App.2003) (holding that in termination proceedings, district court must consider child’s best interests and explain rationale in findings and conclusions and that failure to do so is error requiring remand).
In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D. 771 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D. 771 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
See D.D.G., d at 484 (stating in context of voluntary termination of parental rights that paramount concern in all TPR proceedings is child’s best interests); -26 (Minn.App.2003) (observing in context of involuntary termination of parental rights that if contrary to child’s best interests, termination is inappropriate even when statutory ground for termination exists).