Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Gomez, 721 N.W.2d 871.

118 citing documents.

State v. Burrell 772 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 2009
State v. Burrell 772 N.W.2d 459 Minn. 2009
see State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491 , Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Morales 764 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Morales 764 N.W.2d 621 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
State v. Evans 756 N.W.2d 854 Minn. 2008
State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
State v. Clark 755 N.W.2d 241 Minn. 2008
State v. Bartylla 755 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2008
State v. Bartylla 755 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2008
see State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488 , Minn. R. Evid.
State v. Rucker 752 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Rucker 752 N.W.2d 538 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Spence 742 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Spence 742 N.W.2d 203 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“Inconsistencies or conflicts between one witness and another do not necessarily constitute false testimony or serve as a basis for reversal.” Id.; (“It is not the province of [the appellate] court to reconcile conflicting evidence”).
State v. Vance 734 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
State v. Vance 734 N.W.2d 650 Minn. 2007
An erroneous jury instruction “is prejudicial if there is a reasonable likelihood that giving the instruction in question had a significant effect on the jury verdict.”
State v. Ferguson 729 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Ferguson 729 N.W.2d 604 Minn. Ct. App. 2007