DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Carter, 697 N.W.2d 199.

120 citing documents.

  • State v. Diede 795 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 2011
  • State v. Diede 795 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 2011
    1889 , 20 L.Ed.2d 917 (1968) (holding that a police officer who saw the defendant talking with several known drug addicts had no "constitutionally adequate, reasonable grounds” to seize the defendant and search him for narcotics); 212 (Minn.2005) (holding that police had not articulated a reasonable suspicion that drugs were in a storage unit rented by a defendant who had two previous drug convictions and who made frequent visits to the storage unit).
  • State v. Baumann 759 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Baumann 759 N.W.2d 237 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. Holiday 749 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Holiday 749 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    “A person’s criminal record is among the circumstances a judge may consider when determining whether probable cause exists for a search warrant.”
  • State v. Jordan 742 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Jordan 742 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 2007
    See, -11 (Minn.2005) (holding that a tenant has an expectation of privacy in a self-storage unit and suppressing evidence seized in the search without requiring that the defendant be present at the time of the search); 790 (Minn.2007) (holding that the warrantless search was legal
  • State v. Davis 732 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Davis 732 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 2007
  • Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
  • Jacobson v. $55,900 in U.S. Currency 728 N.W.2d 510 Minn. 2007
  • State v. Melde 725 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Melde 725 N.W.2d 99 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Gail 713 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 2006
  • State v. Gail 713 N.W.2d 851 Minn. 2006
    “When examining whether a search was supported by probable cause, the ultimate question is whether there is a ‘fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.’ ” (Carter III) (quoting Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238 , 103 S.Ct.
  • State v. Davis 711 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
  • State v. Davis 711 N.W.2d 841 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
    (citing United States v. Place, 462 U.S. 696, 707 , 103 S.Ct.
  • Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
  • Kahn v. Griffin 701 N.W.2d 815 Minn. 2005
    We have repeatedly stated that we will not “cavalierly construe our state constitution more expansively than the United States Supreme Court has construed the federal constitution.” -27 (Minn.1985); Wiegand, Harris, d at 98