Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Ross, 676 N.W.2d 301.
- State of Minnesota v. Stuart Donald Luhm 880 N.W.2d 606 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Earl Eugene Ashmore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Earl Eugene Ashmore Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Mark Anthony Sanders Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Mark Anthony Sanders
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Further, “an informant who has given reliable information in the past is likely also currently reliable[.]”
- Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
previously worked as an informant, 2 We are not persuaded.
- State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Vilaysack Sirimanothay
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[A]n informant who has given reliable information in the past is likely also currently reliable.”
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Keith Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ronald Keith Halverson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Kunta Kinta Viverette Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Jonathan Lamont Davis
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
McCloskey, d at 703; State v. Wiley, 366
- State of Minnesota v. Amanda Nicole Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Amanda Nicole Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ejay Freeman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Ejay Freeman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Gene Charles Walters, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State of Minnesota v. Devon Griffen Seivers
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
There is no need for law-enforcement officers to provide specifics of the informant’s past veracity.” d 301, 304 (Minn. App. 2004) (citation and quotation omitted).
- State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Torrence Cortez Epps
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
raffickers and the seizure of narcotics, weapons, ammunition, property and amounts of money which have been prosecuted within the State and Federal court system.” While Epps argues that the affidavit should have included far more detail regarding the CRI’s relationship with police, it is not necessary for law enforcement “to provide specifics of the informant’s past veracity.”
- State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Carliss David-Lee Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Shawnti Tramayne Fleming
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See, e.g., Munson, d at 136 (considering CRI’s proven track record and the corroboration of details about a vehicle and its occupants); (considering firsthand observations and corroboration of defendant’s name, nickname, physical description, gang affiliation, and vehicle information); -05 (Minn. App. 2004) (considering CRI’s track record, firsthand knowledge, corroboration of suspect’s clothing, vehicle information, time and place of arrival, and correlation of the suspect’s given name with his
- State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Janice Marie Cortes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. James Irving Dale Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Janice Marie Cortes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Antanie Devon Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Antanie Devon Johnson
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Johnson contends that police corroboration here was insufficient, review denied (Minn. July 23, 2000).
- State of Minnesota v. Travis Malik Galtney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Travis Malik Galtney Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Leon Abb Barnes Minn. Ct. App. 2014
-
State of Minnesota v. Leon Abb Barnes
Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“[A] first-time citizen informant is presumably reliable.”).