Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Anyanwu, 681 N.W.2d 411.

71 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Gerald Raymond Gustafson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee King Minn. Ct. App. 2015
2; (“[A] defendant has a right to challenge his guilty plea on direct appeal even though he has not moved to withdraw the guilty plea in the district court.”)).
State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In State v. Anyanwu, we observed that “a defendant who challenges a judgment of conviction against him based on an invalid guilty plea may seek a post-conviction hearing from the district court or may appeal directly to [the Minnesota Court of Appeals].” n.1 (Minn. App. 2004).
Joseph Jermaine Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Joseph Jermaine Henderson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Miller 849 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Miller 849 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Sailee 792 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Sailee 792 N.W.2d 90 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 216 , (prohibiting court participation in plea bargaining); (citing impropriety of the court’s advance promise of a particular sentence).
State v. Hannibal 786 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Hannibal 786 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
When the district court promises a particular sentence in advance of the defendant’s guilty plea, it is “the arrangement itself [that] is impermissible.”
Melde v. State 778 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Melde v. State 778 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
The district court has a role to play in plea negotiations, but it may not “usurp the responsibility of counsel or become excessively involved in plea negotiations and may not improperly inject itself into plea negotiations.” (citing State v. Johnson, 279 Minn. 209, 215-16 , ).
State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Brown 758 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Anderson v. State 746 N.W.2d 901 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-15 (Minn.App.2004); State v. Vahabi -61 (Minn.App.1995).
State v. Spraggins 742 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Spraggins 742 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
-15 (Minn.App.2004) (finding that when the district court had promised the defendant a particular sentence, the defendant must be afforded the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea because the district court had “abandoned its independent role and become an advocate.”).