Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gada v. Dedefo, 684 N.W.2d 512.

122 citing documents.

Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ahmadani Hassan Mohamed v. Eric Elijah Aaron Minn. Ct. App. 2015
On appeal, this court will “neither reconcile conflicting evidence nor decide issues of witness credibility, which are exclusively the province of the factfinder.”
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
P. 52.01; (stating that, on appeal, appellate courts “neither reconcile conflicting evidence nor decide issues of witness credibility, which are exclusively the province of the 10 factfinder”).
Katie Kaloustian v. Dakota Fence Co., Landscape Structures, Inc., Independent School District No. 152 of Clay County, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Katie Kaloustian v. Dakota Fence Co., Landscape Structures, Inc., Independent School District No. 152 of Clay County, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“We neither reconcile conflicting evidence nor decide issues of witness credibility, which are exclusively the province of the factfinder.” 9 (“It is not within the province of appellate courts to determine issues of fact on appeal.”).
In the Matter of the Cross Application of Anthony E. Sampair and Laurie K. Sampair to register the … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Cross Application of Anthony E. Sampair and Laurie K. Sampair to register the … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
11 district court credibility determinations and will “neither reconcile conflicting evidence nor decide issues of witness credibility, which are exclusively the province of the factfinder.”
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Peiliang Yuan v. Te Hao, and In re the Matter of: Te Hao … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But “to warrant reversal, the district court’s findings must be clearly erroneous or manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander 855 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Andrew Will Alexander 855 N.W.2d 340 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(stating that, on appeal, appellate courts “neither reconcile conflicting evidence nor decide issues of witness credibility, which are exclusively the province of the factfinder”).
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Children of M.A.H. 839 N.W.2d 730 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Ekman v. Miller 812 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Ekman v. Miller 812 N.W.2d 892 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. Coons 795 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. Coons 795 N.W.2d 625 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
province of the factfinder.” (quotation omitted) (stating that in OFP proceedings, an appellate court may not alter a district court’s credibility determinations, even when based on contradictory testimony, unless its findings are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence a
Pechovnik v. Pechovnik 765 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Pechovnik v. Pechovnik 765 N.W.2d 94 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
“We will not reverse merely because we view the evidence differently.”
Kellogg v. Woods 720 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Kellogg v. Woods 720 N.W.2d 845 Minn. Ct. App. 2006