DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Conger, 687 N.W.2d 639.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Robinson 699 N.W.2d 790 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    20, 2005); review granted (Minn. Dec.
  • State v. Boehl 697 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Boehl 697 N.W.2d 215 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    (involving guilty plea), review granted (Minn. Dec.
  • State v. Beaty 696 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Dettman 696 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Dettman 696 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    This court has applied Blakely to Minnesota’s sentencing guidelines scheme, holding that “when a [district court] imposes an upward durational departure from the presumptive, fixed sentence established by the Sentencing Guidelines Commission, the [district court’s] reasons for departing must be supported by facts that were found by a jury or admitted by the defendant.” review granted (Minn. Dec.
  • State v. Beaty 696 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    (per curiam) 3 ; -45 (Minn.App.2004) (applying Blakely to upward du-rational departures imposed under Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines and holding that, when sentence is imposed pursuant to a guilty plea, reasons for departing du-rationally must be based solely on facts admitted by the defendant), review granted (Minn. Dec.
  • State v. Thompson 694 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Thompson 694 N.W.2d 117 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    review *122 granted (Minn. Dec.
  • State v. Barker 692 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Barker 692 N.W.2d 755 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    (ordering additional briefing on appropriate remedy); review granted (Minn. Dec.
  • State v. Senske 692 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
  • State v. Senske 692 N.W.2d 743 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
    review granted (Minn. Dec.
  • State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Brooks 690 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Hagen 690 N.W.2d 155 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Brooks 690 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    this court held that Minnesota’s sentencing guidelines are subject to the analysis set forth in Blakely .
  • State v. Brown 689 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Brown 689 N.W.2d 796 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    (remanding with direction that any upward departure be supported by factual determination of aggravating factors).
  • State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Petschl 688 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Petschl 688 N.W.2d 866 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Johnson 689 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Fairbanks 688 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Saue 688 N.W.2d 337 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
  • State v. Fairbanks 688 N.W.2d 333 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
    2004 WL 2340067, at *4 (Minn.App.