Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., 701 N.W.2d 783.

46 citing documents.

Josh Campion, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Thus, courts strictly construe these agreements “against the benefited party.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., (quotation omitted).
Erica Robinson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
1965), for the proposition that “an innkeeper has a duty to its guests to take reasonable action to protect them against unreasonable risk of physical harm.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
Minn. 2023
See Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., 791 (Minn. 2005) (considering disparity in bargaining power for exculpatory and indemnity clauses); Hauenstein & Bermeister, Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., Inc., (analyzing bargaining power to determine the reasonableness of a forum selection clause); Staffing Specifix, d
Arch Insurance Company, as subrogee of Centre Rental, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See id.; see also Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., d 783, 786-87, 789-93 (Minn. 2005) (quoting a similar clause before analyzing exculpatory and indemnification clauses in a houseboat rental agreement).
Minn. 2022
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
Bentley S. Poitra, et al., Minn. 2021
See Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., (holding an indemnification clause in a rental agreement void as violative of public policy as it shifted liability to the guests Voyagaire had a duty to protect).
Estate of: Steven C. Kukowski, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
East View Information Services, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Yang v. Voyagair e Houseboats, Inc.
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
Dewitt v. London Rd. Rental Ctr., Inc. 910 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 2018
Yang v. VoyagaireHouseboats, Inc. , , 788 (Minn. 2005).
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
DeWitt v. London Road Rental Center, Inc. 899 N.W.2d 883 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But “[i]n-demnification clauses are subject to greater scrutiny because they release negligent parties from liability but may also shift liability to innocent parties.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., , 792 n.6 (Minn. 2005).
Carmen Price, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Indemnification clauses are subject to greater scrutiny because they release negligent parties from liability, but also may shift liability to innocent parties.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., n.6 (Minn. 2005).
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017
Cf. Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., (declining to enforce exculpatory and indemnification clauses in a rental agreement that violated public policy).
Veronica Anczarski v. Rick Palm Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Veronica Anczarski v. Rick Palm Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To be sure, an exculpatory clause is construed against the party that seeks to benefit from it and may be unenforceable if it “purports to release the benefited party from liability for intentional, willful or wanton acts.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., d 783, 789 (Minn. 2005).
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Kenneth A. Roseland v. Joseph A. Wentzell, Attorney at Law, Richard L. Kusick, and Roseland Acres, LLC, third … 864 N.W.2d 356 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
questions of law.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., –89 (Minn. 2005).
Gary Carlson v. Ray Barta Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Gary Carlson v. Ray Barta Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., d 783, 791 (Minn. 2005) (quotation omitted).
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 803 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Starlite Ltd. Partnership v. Landry's Restaurants, Inc. 780 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
In Re the Petition of Crablex, Inc. 762 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
In Re the Petition of Crablex, Inc. 762 N.W.2d 247 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
II “On appeal from summary judgment, we determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 754 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Van Kampen v. Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. 754 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
P. 56.03; Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State Ex Rel. Friends of the Riverfront v. City of Minneapolis 751 N.W.2d 586 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
P. 56.03; Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
Carlson v. Allstate Insurance Co. 749 N.W.2d 41 Minn. 2008
See, e.g., Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., (on review of grant of summary judgment, viewing facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted).
Superior Construction Services, Inc. v. Belton 749 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Superior Construction Services, Inc. v. Belton 749 N.W.2d 388 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
ANALYSIS “On appeal from summary judgment, we determine whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Star Windshield Repair, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Star Windshield Repair, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Paradigm Enterprises, Inc. v. Westfield National Insurance Co. 738 N.W.2d 416 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Camacho v. Todd & Leiser Homes, Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., -89 (Minn.2005).
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
See Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc.
Johanns v. Minnesota Mobile Storage, Inc. 720 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Johanns v. Minnesota Mobile Storage, Inc. 720 N.W.2d 5 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
at 926 ; see Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., -91 (Minn.2005) (holding that where company providing houseboat acted as innkeeper providing regulated public service, with duty to protect guests, exculpatory clause not enforceable).
Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2006
Nelson v. Productive Alternatives, Inc. 715 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2006
But see, (noting that courts will review certain contract provi *458 sions to determine whether they violate public policy).
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 706 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Drewitz v. Motorwerks, Inc. 706 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
See Yang v. Voyagaire Houseboats, Inc., -89 (Minn.2005) (stating that effect of unambiguous contract is question of law).