Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Henderson, 706 N.W.2d 758.

65 citing documents.

State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
State v. Martin 773 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 2009
State v. Jackson 749 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2008
State v. Jackson 749 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 2008
Guidelines II.D.b.(8) and (9); (holding that enhanced sentencing under the career offender statute required jury findings).
State v. Maurstad 733 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 2007
State v. Maurstad 733 N.W.2d 141 Minn. 2007
See, (recognizing that under certain circumstances, a defendant’s failure to object to sentencing issues at the time of sentencing will foreclose appellate review of those issues).
State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Id.; -63 (Minn.2005) (considering career-offender sentencing-enhancement statute, codified at Minn.Stat.
State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
State v. McFee 721 N.W.2d 607 Minn. 2006
State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
State v. Osborne 715 N.W.2d 436 Minn. 2006
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Lushenko 714 N.W.2d 729 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Adkins 706 N.W.2d 59 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
The state relies on an unpublished opinion, State v. Henderson, 2004 WL 1925395 , (Minn.App.