Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hickman v. SAFECO Insurance Co. of America, 695 N.W.2d 365.

32 citing documents.

DAMHOF Dairy v. Connie Stahnke, et al., Joan Blonigan Christianson Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Am., N. Nat’l Bank of Bemidji v. N. Minn. Nat’l Bank of Duluth, (“As a general rule, strangers to a contract acquire no rights under such a contract.
In the Matter of the Unlicensed Debt Collection Activity of PurCo Fleet Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Unlicensed Debt Collection Activity of PurCo Fleet Services, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co. of Am., n.7 (Minn. 2005) (ascertaining contracting parties’ intent to benefit a third party by reading contract terms in light of all the surrounding circumstances to determine whether there is an “objective manifestation” of such intent).
Michelin Properties LLC, Clean Care LLC v. Jacobson Environmental, PLLC, et al., City & County Credit Union Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Star Bank v. Robert W Anderson, et al., Bushmills Ethanol, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Linden Place Villas Homeowner’s Association v. Advanced Innovative Management Corp. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co. of Am., –24 (Minn. App. 1987), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
Scott Mathias v. Ann Lee Coleman Living Trust, dated March 21, 2018 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
AllenMax Construction, LLC, et al v. The Wright Group, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Co. of Am., (“Generally, a stranger to a contract does not have rights under the contract, but an except ion exists if a third party is 11 an intended beneficiary of the contract.”).
In re the Marriage of: Sonja Vogen Baertsch v. Andrew Baertsch Minn. Ct. App. 2018
James Linn, et al v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
James Linn, et al v. BCBSM, Inc. 890 N.W.2d 160 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co. of Am., n.8 (Minn. 2005).
Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Minnesota Laborers Health & Welfare Fund v. Granite RE, Inc. 826 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
Caldas v. Affordable Granite & Stone, Inc. 820 N.W.2d 826 Minn. 2012
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
In re the Pamela Andreas Stisser Grantor Trust 818 N.W.2d 495 Minn. 2012
Co. of Am., (holding that interpretation of an unambiguous insurance contract presents a question of law).
Savela v. City of Duluth 806 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 2011
Hoeft v. Hennepin County 754 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Hoeft v. Hennepin County 754 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co. of Am., (stating that a person retains certain rights relating to an insurance contract to which he is the intended beneficiary even though he is not a direct party to the contract).
Marchio v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 747 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Marchio v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 747 N.W.2d 376 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. 741 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2007
Lee v. Fresenius Medical Care, Inc. 741 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2007
Fin Ag, Inc. v. Hufnagle, Inc. 720 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 2006
Fin Ag, Inc. v. Hufnagle, Inc. 720 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 2006
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Cargill, Inc. v. Jorgenson Farms 719 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 703 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 2005
Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co. 703 N.W.2d 513 Minn. 2005