Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights, 708 N.W.2d 162.

68 citing documents.

Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River Township Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (concluding that certiorari was not the proper procedure to address a city’s rezoning decision because “rezoning involves a legislative determination”); Mendota Golf, (noting a declaratory-judgment action as appropriate to review a city’s action denying a comprehensive-plan amendment).
500, LLC v. City of Minneapolis 837 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 2013
500, LLC v. City of Minneapolis 837 N.W.2d 287 Minn. 2013
1 (2012), which is the “the primary land use control for cities and supersedes all other municipal [ordinances] when [the ordinances] are in conflict with the plan,” Mendota Golf
Duncan v. Roy 830 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Duncan v. Roy 830 N.W.2d 48 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“[A] writ of mandamus does not control the particular manner in which a duty is to be performed and does not dictate how discretion is to be exercised.” Mendota Golf
Johnson v. State 801 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 2011
Johnson v. State 801 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 2011
See Mendota Golf, (“[Rjather than requiring [the party] to restate its claims in a declaratory judgment action, we will consider the substance of the parties’ arguments....
Houck v. EASTERN CARVER COUNTY SCHOOLS 787 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Houck v. EASTERN CARVER COUNTY SCHOOLS 787 N.W.2d 227 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORS 772 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Faegre & Benson, LLP v. R & R INVESTORS 772 N.W.2d 846 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
See, e.g., Mendota Golf, -67 (Minn.2006) (determining applicability of amended statute).
Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of Minnesota 765 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Eagan Economic Development Authority v. U-Haul Co. of Minnesota 765 N.W.2d 403 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Because a city’s resolution is a legislative decision, Mendota Golf, and because the redevelopment plan was incorporated by resolution 01-63, we hold that the city intended every provision in the plan to have its full effect.
Calm Waters, LLC v. Kanabec County Board of Commissioners 756 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 2008
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Edina Community Lutheran Church v. State 745 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Mendota Golf, Advantage Capital Mgmt.
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007