Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hannon, 703 N.W.2d 498.

90 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson 882 N.W.2d 579 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Faron Wayne Ruel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William James Holisky, II Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. William James Holisky, II Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“If the defense was not prejudiced by a refusal to issue an instruction, there is no reversible error.”
State of Minnesota v. Faron Wayne Ruel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Joseph Mirkovich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Scott Joseph Mirkovich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
5 no obligation to instruct the jury, sua sponte, concerning the defense of intoxication.” –12 (Minn. 2005).
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Matthew Quiceno Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ronald Matthew Quiceno Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. Fordyce Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Thiel 846 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Thiel 846 N.W.2d 605 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Chavarria-Cruz 839 N.W.2d 515 Minn. 2013
State v. Ferguson 804 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2011
State v. Ferguson 804 N.W.2d 586 Minn. 2011
(citing Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400 , 411 n. 15, 108 S.Ct.
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
State v. Jenkins 782 N.W.2d 211 Minn. 2010
Hannon v. State 781 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2010
Hannon v. State 781 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 2010
State v. Hannon (Hannon II)
State v. McClenton 781 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. McClenton 781 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
“[I]n cases in which no evidence is adduced to support acquitting of the greater charge and convicting of the lesser, the lesser instruction is not required.”
State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
State v. Atkinson 774 N.W.2d 584 Minn. 2009
Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
Wright v. State 765 N.W.2d 85 Minn. 2009
State v. Hall 764 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 2009
State v. Hall 764 N.W.2d 837 Minn. 2009
Determining whether a jury instruction should be given “lies within the discretion of the district court and will not be reversed but for an abuse of that discretion.”
State v. Van Keuren 759 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2008
State v. Van Keuren 759 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 2008
State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Romine 757 N.W.2d 884 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
Hannon v. State 752 N.W.2d 518 Minn. 2008
State v. Hannon (Hannon II)
State v. Bird 734 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2007
State v. Bird 734 N.W.2d 664 Minn. 2007
State v. Goodloe 718 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 2006
State v. Goodloe 718 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 2006
State v. Johnson 719 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 2006
State v. Johnson 719 N.W.2d 619 Minn. 2006
Determining whether a jury instruction should be given “lies within the discretion of the district court and will not be reversed but for an abuse of that discretion.”