Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re Estate of Martignacco, 689 N.W.2d 262.

25 citing documents.

In re the Estate of Roy Gene Barts, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
An appellate court “will not reverse the district court’s determination regarding [appointment] of a personal representative unless the district court clearly abused its discretion by disregarding the facts.” See Est. of Martignacco, 7 (Minn. App. 2004), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Estate of John Kenneth Rutt, a/k/a John K. Rutt and John Rutt Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The probate court “has discretion to determine suitability of a personal representative, and that determination will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of: Josephine Lucille Bicanich, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
An appellate court “will not reverse the district court’s determination regarding removal of a personal representative unless the district court clearly abused its discretion by disregarding the facts.” rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of: Wade Scott Carlson, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 262, 269 (Minn. App. 2004) (reviewing district court’s appointment of personal representative), rev. denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of: Joann Roselia Gregory, aka JoAnn R. Gregory and aka JoAnn Gregory, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Estate of: Sylvia Ann Mourning, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re: the Estate of LaVonne Ruth Anderson-Stewart, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of Nelson 901 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Estate of Nelson 901 N.W.2d 234 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellants argue that parentage for probate purposes is not exclusively determined under the parentage act and that they may still establish that they are heirs by clear-and-convincing evidence, relying on review denied (Minn. Jan, 26, 2005), and
A16-1546 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Appellants argue that parentage for probate purposes is not ex clusively determined under the parentage act and that they may still establish that they are heirs by clear-and- convincing evidence, relying on review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of Mae Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of Mae Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court has discretion to determine suitability of a personal representative, and that determination will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of: Bernie E. Pederson, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Bernie E. Pederson, Decedent. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
An appellate court “will not reverse the district court’s determination regarding removal of a personal representative unless the district court clearly abused its discretion by disregarding the facts.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of: Mary Ann Nething Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Estate of: Mary Ann Nething Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“The district court has discretion to determine suitability of a personal representative,” and we will not reverse that determination “unless the district court clearly abused its discretion by disregarding the facts.” (citing Estate of Crosby, 218 Minn. at 157-58, d at 506, and ).
In re the Supervised Estate of: Timothy D. Kehr Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Supervised Estate of: Timothy D. Kehr Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“This court will not reverse the district court’s determination regarding removal of a personal representative unless the district court clearly abused its discretion by 7 disregarding the facts.” review denied (Minn. Jan.
Limberg v. Mitchell 834 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Limberg v. Mitchell 834 N.W.2d 211 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
17, 2009); (affirming district court’s award of summary judgment based on clear and convincing standard applicable to establishing parentage for purposes of intestate succession), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In re the Estate of Holmberg 823 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Estate of Holmberg 823 N.W.2d 875 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Appellant’s reliance on review denied (Minn. Jan.
In Re the Estate of Jotham 704 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Estate of Jotham 704 N.W.2d 210 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
(noting that applying the parentage act’s limitations period to that case “would make it virtually impossible for ‘undiscovered,’ nonmarital children to establish paternity since the Parentage Act requires this to be done no later than one year after the child reaches the age of majority” and that

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by