Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of the Children of J.B., 698 N.W.2d 160.

67 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: P. J. M. and A. D. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Midway Ctr., Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, d 76, 78 (1975) (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error); (applying Midway in a termination-of-parental-rights case).
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Child of: C. A. L. and R. C. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Inc., 306 Minn. 352, 356, (stating that to prevail on appeal, an appellant must show both error and prejudice resulting from the error); (applying Midway in a termination-of-parental-rights case).
In re the Marriage of: Daria Vladimirovna Tinaza v. Justin Andrew Tinaza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Daria Vladimirovna Tinaza v. Justin Andrew Tinaza Minn. Ct. App. 2015
But, “[t]he weight to be given any testimony, including expert testimony, is 11 ultimately the province of the fact-finder.” d 160, 167 (Minn. App. 2005).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: K. A.-P. and D. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review dismissed (Minn. May 3, 2005).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. and C. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of J.H. 829 N.W.2d 607 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
review dismissed (Minn. May 3, 2005).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of D.F. 752 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
But “[t]he weight to be given any testimony, including expert testimony, is ultimately the province of the fact-finder.”
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W. 727 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
In Re the Welfare of the Children of S.W. 727 N.W.2d 144 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
“Generally, whether a witness qualifies as an expert is an issue within the discretion of the district court.” review dismissed (Minn. May 3, 2005).