Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lundell v. COOPERATIVE POWER ASS'N, 707 N.W.2d 376.

26 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Renee Jean Tapper Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Renee Jean Tapper Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Power Ass’n, n.1 (Minn. 2006).
Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., Plaintiff, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jerald Boitnott, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Power Ass’n, n.1 (Minn. 2006); rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
The City of Minneapolis, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Power Ass’n, (quoting Hous.
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert Reiland, Below, Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P., successor … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation v. Robert Reiland, Below, Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P., successor … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
City of Apple Valley v. William C. Thompson (deceased), Below, Gene Rechtzigel, individually and as trustee of Evelyn … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
City of Apple Valley v. William C. Thompson (deceased), Below, Gene Rechtzigel, individually and as trustee of Evelyn … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Power Ass’n, n.1(Minn. 2006) (“We discourage district courts from adopting proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law verbatim because it does not allow the parties or a reviewing court to determine the extent to which the court’s decision was independently made.”).
Guardian Energy, LLC, Relator v. County of Waseca 868 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 2015
444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of Ramsey 811 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2012
444 Lafayette, LLC v. County of Ramsey 811 N.W.2d 106 Minn. 2012
Power Ass’n, , 380 n. 1 (Minn.2006) (stating that the district court’s adoption of one party’s proposed findings “does not allow the parties or a reviewing court to determine the extent to which the court’s decision was independently made”).
County of Dakota v. Blackwell 809 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
County of Dakota v. Blackwell 809 N.W.2d 226 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Power Ass'n, , 380 n. 1 (Minn.2006) ("We discourage district courts from adopting proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law verbatim because it does not allow the parties or a reviewing court to determine the extent to which the court's decision - was - independently made.").
State ex rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Kettleson 801 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 2011
State ex rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Kettleson 801 N.W.2d 160 Minn. 2011
Power Ass’n, -81 (Minn.2006).
Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of Hennepin 797 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2011
Eden Prairie Mall, LLC v. County of Hennepin 797 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 2011
Power Ass’n, , 380 n. 1 (Minn.2006) (stating that adopting one party’s proposed findings “does not allow the parties or a reviewing court to determine the extent to which the court’s decision was independently made”); , 707 n. 2 (Minn.2005) (“[T]he district court’s findings should reflect t
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
City of Willmar v. Kvam 769 N.W.2d 775 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
C.O. v. Doe 757 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 2008
Power Ass’n, , 380 n. 1 (Minn.2006).
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
City of Granite Falls v. Soo Line Railroad 742 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 712 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Rasmussen v. Housing & Redevelopment Authority 712 N.W.2d 802 Minn. Ct. App. 2006