DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bell, 719 N.W.2d 635.

167 citing documents.

  • In re the Welfare of J.H. 844 N.W.2d 28 Minn. 2014
    3-4; (concluding that an issue not raised by the defendant below or in his petition for review was waived and not properly before the court).
  • State v. Nelson 823 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
  • State v. Nelson 823 N.W.2d 908 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
  • State v. Swinger 800 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
  • State v. Swinger 800 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
    “When balancing the probative value against the potential prejudice, unfair prejudice is not merely damaging evidence, even severely damaging evidence; rather, unfair prejudice is evidence that persuades by illegitimate means, giving one party an unfair advantage.” (quotation omitted).
  • State v. McCurry 770 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
  • State v. McCurry 770 N.W.2d 553 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
    See State v. Bell -42 (Minn.2006) (discussing statute in context of charges for burglary and violating an order for protection).
  • State v. Word 755 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Word 755 N.W.2d 776 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    “The term ‘relationship evidence’ has been used to describe any evidence that is offered to illuminate the relationship between the accused and the alleged victim.” , 638 n. 4 (Minn.2006).
  • State v. Lindsey 755 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Lindsey 755 N.W.2d 752 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. O'MEARA 755 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. O'MEARA 755 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Meyer 749 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Meyer 749 N.W.2d 844 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
    -39 (Minn.2006); review denied (Minn. Jan.
  • State v. Sanders 743 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
  • State v. Sanders 743 N.W.2d 616 Minn. Ct. App. 2008